|
International
Whooping Crane Recovery Team
WHOOPING CRANE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES
October
2003 - February 2004
By
Tom Stehn
USFWS Whooping Crane Coordinator

photo by USFWS; Joel Trick
|
PDF
Version
CONTENTS
HIGHLIGHTS
ARANSAS
- WOOD BUFFALO
Summer
2003
Fall Migration, 2003
Winter 2003-2004
Freshwater
Inflows
WHOOPING
CRANE CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT AND RECOVERY TEAM
WHOOPING
CRANE RECOVERY PLAN
ADMINISTRATION
SPECIMENS
PLATTE
RIVER
CENTRAL
FLORIDA
WHOOPING
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP
CAPTIVE
FLOCKS -
ACRES
CALGARY
ICF
LOWRY PARK
PATUXENT
SAN
ANTONIO
WHOOPING
CRANE NUMBERS - February 29, 2004
HIGHLIGHTS
A record 194 whooping cranes arrived at Aransas in Fall 2003. The
total included 25 juveniles arriving safely at Aransas from the 28 that
had fledged. This excellent production in Wood Buffalo allowed the population
to increase by 9 birds over last winter.
Captive breeding
facilities had an excellent production season in 2003 and fledged 41 chicks.
Chicks were provided for the nonmigratory flock in Florida (16), the ultralight
project (17), five held back for genetic purposes as future breeders,
one held back as a display bird, and two held back with health problems.
Sixteen captive
whooping crane juveniles were released in central Florida with a high
rate of survival. Sixteen more juveniles successfully completed flight
training and followed ultralight aircraft to Florida. The migration was
beset by bad weather with many delays, but the migration team perservered
and completed the 1,191-mile migration in 54 days.
Whooping
crane numbers at the end of February 2004, both captive (119) and wild
(312), totaled 431.
ARANSAS
- WOOD BUFFALO
SUMMER,
2003
Two subadult whooping cranes made history by summering in British
Columbia, just west of Jasper National Park along the Fraser River by
Prince George. The two cranes were 560 miles southwest of the nesting
area and 522 miles west of the western edge of the usual migration corridor.
The spread of birds summering in Canada now spans 1075 miles east to
west (southcentral Manitoba in 1999 to east central B.C. in 2003). Given
this instance of straying from a migration corridor, it should not have
been so surprising that three Wisconsin whooping cranes continued their
migration and summered in South Dakota.
FALL
MIGRATION , 2003
The fall migration was the 57d migration monitored since tracking
began in the fall of 1975. It is a cooperative effort by private organizations,
state and federal conservation agencies, and Canadian Wildlife Service.
U.S. records are compiled by Wally Jobman of USFWS-ES in Grand Island,
Nebraska, who provided the following information (Jobman 2004, Cooperative
Whooping Crane Tracking Project (August 2003-January 2004).
"The
first dates for confirmed observations of migrating whooping cranes
were August 26 in Canada and October 1 in the U. S. The latest sighting
date was October 29th in Canada and December 19th in the U.S. Sightings
were reported from Saskatchewan (24), Montana (1), North Dakota (7),
South Dakota (4), Nebraska (6), Kansas (13), Oklahoma (14) and Texas
(14). Weather during September and October, 2003, was unseasonably mild
and dry in the northern Great Plains. The first major storm system of
the fall, which moved through Nebraska on October 30, brought colder
weather and snow to Saskatchewan and the Dakotas. No whooper sightings
were reported north of Kansas after November 5, an indication that the
storm system had pushed most cranes into Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.
This storm system stalled in northern Texas and did not reach the Texas
coast until November 6-7. As a result, 41 of the 59 fall sightings confirmed
in the U.S. were from Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas. Approximately 24
whooping cranes were sighted at Salt Plains NWR in Oklahoma. Five color-marked
cranes were reported out of 25 banded cranes.
The 14
sightings in Texas was unusually high, a state through which whooping
cranes usually migrate rapidly. A pair with two chicks was first observed
at Aransas on October 25, only 8 days after leaving Saskatchewan. A
lone juvenile whooping crane, confirmed in Saskatchewan in early October,
was reported in Young County, Texas on November 2 and may have wintered
in an unknown location with sandhill cranes. One crane was shot by a
hunter in Texas on November 14. The first 2 whooping cranes arrived
at Aransas on October 18th. About 86 % of all arrivals (i.e. 167 birds)
occurred between October 23 and November 19, very similar to the previous
fall."
An adult
whooping crane was shot and killed November 14th south of Dallas, Texas.
A suspect was apprehended by a TPWD game warden and the case turned
over to USFWS.
Four whooping
cranes had been present for several days feeding in a cornfield during
the day and presumably roosting at night on Lake Bardwell. One crane
was shot about 15 minutes before sunset apparently as it flew to roost.
Locals heard shots coming from Waxahachie Creek, a part of Lake Bardwell
near Ennis, Texas. With waterfowl season closed, the local warden was
called. TPWD Warden James Powell responded and apprehended the hunter
with 3 ducks plus 1 whooping crane hidden in a bag tucked under the
bow of his boat. The hunter indicated he had shot a white crane. The
necropsy showed bird to be an adult female with about 20 shot pellets
in her. The 3 remaining cranes resumed migration 2 days after the shooting
incident. In early February, the suspect pleaded guilty. Sentencing
is not expected until at least April.
Any shooting
of a whooping crane is an unfortunate situation. In this case, the shooting
was done by a hunter during a closed waterfowl season and closed sandhill
crane season and without the required reservoir hunting permit from
the Corps of Engineers. This was the 7th known whooping crane to be
shot in North America dating back to 1989, an average of nearly one
loss every other year. Shootings have been located in Texas (3), Florida
(3), and Canada (1). Only three of the shootings were connected with
hunting seasons. Efforts need to be continued to implement the Federal-State
contingency plan, and to inform hunters about whooping cranes, including
annual press releases, brochures, web pages, hunter education classes,
and law enforcement presence. This was discussed at the Central Flyway
Technical meetings held in Texas on March 1, 2004.
WINTER
2003-2004
The
Aransas-Wood Buffalo population in 2003 made a significant increase
of 9 cranes above the peak count of 185 in the 2002-03 winter. This
was the second straight year where the population increased by exactly
nine cranes. The peak population at Aransas during the winter of 2003-04
was estimated at 194, breaking the previous all-time high of 188 set
in the 1999-2000 winter. Twenty-five juveniles arrived at Aransas in
the fall. This included one set of twins that made the migration from
Saskatchewan to Aransas in 8 days. Adult mortality between spring and
fall, 2003 was above average and equaled 15 birds (184 + 25 - 194 =
15).
In the
fall, a whooping crane juvenile separated from its parents was confirmed
in Saskatchewan with sandhills. This juvenile may have been seen in
North Texas in early November, but no subsequent reports were ever received.
In addition to the 194 cranes, a report of 3 more cranes was made about
100 miles north of Aransas in mid-November. However, this report never
materialized into 3 more cranes ever being counted at Aransas.
Conditions
were excellent in the fall when the whooping cranes arrived. Summer
and fall rains kept salinities moderate, the refuge acorn crop was abundant,
and wolfberries and blue crabs sustained the cranes through the end
of 2003. Fall rains really benefited the bays, with 29 inches recorded
at the refuge in the last 4 months of 2003. January and February were
tougher months for the cranes. The wolfberry crop was over, and blue
crabs declined to very low levels by the end of February. Only 2 blue
crabs were found during an hour of walking the marsh on February 9th.
An influx of blue crabs is needed to provide the cranes needed energy
reserves for the migration and breeding season.
One whooping
crane juvenile may have died during the 2003-04 winter. After being
seen two times on their territory in the fall and then moving about
8 miles north the following week, the chick was never seen again. I
also lost track of the unbanded adult pair that apparently did not return
to their territory. It was hoped the family had left the wintering area
intact, but it is much more likely the chick died and is the only listed
mortality of the 2003-04 winter.
Hurricane
Claudette that hit whooping crane critical habitat in mid-July, 2003
played a part in re-opening Cedar Bayou, the natural pass between the
Texas bay system and the Gulf of Mexico in the whooping crane area.
Tidal action subsequent to the hurricane re-opened Cedar Bayou by September
23 and it has remained open throughout the fall and winter. This opening
into the Gulf is extremely important to allow many marine organisms,
including the blue crab, to travel between the bays and the Gulf to
complete their life cycles.
USFWS and
other agencies were sued by Friends of Texas Coastal Passes and the
Recreational Fishing Alliance over the placement of dredge material
at the mouth of Cedar Bayou when the natural pass had silted shut and
was last dredged in 1995. The law suit contends the material was illegally
placed and damages whooping crane marshes on San Jose Island. This matter
is been heard by a Federal judge in Corpus Christi.
A 3-D geophysical
seismic exploration was completed on November 13th just prior to the
arrival of a significant number of cranes. The project involved exploding
5,177 dynamite charges 60+ feet underground located over 21,537 acres
on the south end of Matagorda Island and surrounding bays. Very strict
operating procedures were put into place with satisfactory protection
of the environment achieved. Most of the marsh access was done by airboat
only with minimal use of tracked vehicles in dry marsh.
Commercial
crabbing continues as a major activity in whooping crane critical habitat.
A total of 1,136 crab traps were noted in or near crane areas on an
aerial census at the end of October. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
once again passed a 10-day closure in February of commercial crabbing.
A coast-wide volunteer effort collected 3,571 abandoned traps. An estimated
15,500 traps have been gathered since the program began three years
ago. A considerable number of abandoned crab traps still remained on
Matagorda Island due to the remote location. Tom Stehn and Dennis Pridgen
of TPWD organized an additional pickup operation on February 27th that
removed 310 more traps. Thanks go to all the 18 agency personnel and
8 boats that helped. Aerial surveys later found some 50+ traps still
needing to be picked up on Matagorda, but the marshes look one thousand
percent better than they did several years ago before the annual closure
and volunteer pickup was organized by TPWD.
Colleen
Satyshur, a technician working for the Platte River Whooping Crane Habitat
Trust in Nebraska, spent December to February at Aransas recording crane
unison calls. She recorded approximately 46 of the estimated 69 wintering
adult pairs. Dr. Felipe Chavez-Ramirez, the new Executive Director of
the Platte River Trust, visited Aransas twice to get Colleen started
with the voice printing project, and also did some work trying to document
crab movements in the marshes with video cameras.
The Texas
Nature Conservancy closed on the 734-acre Johnson Ranch that borders
the Lamar Unit of Aransas NWR. The salt marsh area was purchased and
a conservation easement obtained over the oak uplands. The marsh portions
will be transferred over to the refuge in the coming months.
On March
5th, Texas Governor Perry signed the site nomination document for the
Texas National Estuarine Research Reserve. This is an important initial
step, which will be followed, in the coming year with writing an EIS
and management plan. The proposed research reserve, approximately 240,000
acres in size, would be the third largest in the nation and include
the southern portions of whooping crane critical habitat.
FRESHWATER
INFLOWS
Water
issues are huge in Texas, making headlines on a weekly basis throughout
the state. Water issues specifically affect whooping cranes in management
of river inflows from the Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers that enter
whooping crane critical habitat and keep the bays productive. Reduced
inflows mean a reduction in crab populations and less food for whooping
cranes. With the human population of Texas projected to double in the
next 50 years, there has been much talk about creating a mechanism to
provide conservation flows for Texas rivers as the pressure to grant
more water permits grows. Texas law is all aimed at granting water rights
to take water out of rivers, but there is currently no means being used
to ensure adequate flows remain in the rivers. Many river segments are
already over-appropriated.
The Texas
Legislature placed a 2-year moratorium on granting any conservation
flows and created a Study Commission on Environmental Flows to examine
options for protecting instream flows and freshwater inflows to bays
and estuaries. Members were appointed to the Commission by the end of
2003, and hearings commenced in mid-February. Unfortunately, applications
for consumptive water rights continue to be processed. The more permits
TCEQ issues over the next two years to take water out of rivers, the
harder it will be to ensure adequate flows in the future. Tom Stehn
and Felipe Chavez-Ramirez wrote articles on water issues that appeared
in publications of various crane groups. The Texas A & M University
study at Aransas on inflows, crabs, and cranes became operational in
the fall with observation blinds built and graduate students starting
fieldwork.
WHOOPING
CRANE CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT AND RECOVERY TEAMS
The
Whooping Crane Captive Management and Recovery Teams met in Calgary, Alberta
January 29-31, facing temperatures of -20 degrees F below zero whenever
any of the 38 participants were brave enough to leave the hotel. This
annual meeting is important for exchanging ideas, troubleshooting propagation
and health issues, coordinating joint recovery projects, incorporating
genetic considerations into all aspects of recovery, allocating captive
production, formulating reintroduction plans for 2004 and beyond, and
approving captive sites for display of whooping cranes. Whooping crane
recovery involves many different organizations in different states and
provinces, and keeping it all running smoothly is a task that all participate
in.
WHOOPING
CRANE RECOVERY PLAN
Work
continued on updating the Whooping Crane Recovery Plan and writing it
as one international document. A final draft was turned in to USFWS-Region
II in early March 2004. This draft will need to go out for public review.
A draft listing package was prepared in November 2003. Brian Johns modified
the draft plan to fit the new Species at Risk Act (SARA) in Canada. SARA
will also require an "action plan and recovery strategy" document
to be written which Brian completed.
ADMINISTRATION
Tom Stehn edited materials prepared by Nicole Tadano of the National
Wildlife Federation in Washington, D.C., for an on-line course on endangered
species issues. The one lesson plan on the whooping crane, part of the
Endangered Species Series of Wildlife University, the National Wildlife
Federation's online training program, is designed to advance endangered
species protection. Tom also recorded an audio segment for the course.
Lobbying
coordinated by the International Crane Foundation continued for the Crane
Conservation Act, but will most likely have to be delayed during the election
year.
A whooping
crane festival the last week in February in Port Aransas, Texas continues
to grow annually. Recovery Team members George Archibald and Tom Stehn
were speakers at the Festival. Information booths were run by the refuge
and by ICF.
SPECIMENS
The whooping crane CANUS that died last year at the Patuxent Wildlife
Research Center at age 38 and who sired many offspring, was originally
captured with an injured wing in Wood Buffalo National Park. CANUS was
shipped back to Canada at the end of October and will be a prominent feature
at the Northern Lights Museum in Fort Smith, N.W.T. Patuxent also shipped
two specimens to the Crane Meadows Nature Center, Wood River, Nebraska
in mid-October, and 1 specimen to Mascatatuck NWR in Indiana in February.
PLATTE
RIVER
In November, Dr. Felipe Chavez-Ramirez was named the new Executive
Director of the Platte River Whooping Crane Habitat Trust following the
sudden and tragic death of Dr. Paul Currier. Felipe had originally joined
the Trust staff as Avian Ecologist in November of 2001.
Work was
nearly completed on the National Academy of Science's one year review
of Critical Habitat designation for 4 endangered species on the Platte
River to see if the designation is based on sound science. A report is
due out this spring. The Platte River is the third most used habitat in
the whooping crane migration. However, crane habitat has declined tremendously
from past condition due to deepening and forest encroachment in the channel,
and needs to be restored.
A draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for the Platte River Implementation Program was
circulated in February that provides four alternatives for managing endangered
species on the Platte. In an unusual development, the EIS does not pick
a preferred alternative. Public comments on the draft document are due
in June. USFWS is also working on a Biological Opinion for the EIS.
CENTRAL
FLORIDA
At the end of February, estimated numbers of nonmigratory whooping
cranes in central Florida were 64 adults and 18 juveniles (16 from captivity
and 2 fledged in the wild) for a total of 82 birds, including 17 adult
pairs. This is a conservative figure since not all whooping cranes can
be tracked due to failed radio transmitters. Between July and December
2003, the team documented the loss of 5 older birds and 1 juvenile. They
also captured an impressive 19 cranes for health checks and transmitter
replacement.
Sixteen juveniles
arrived in central Florida in two separate cohorts of 8, one cohort from
the International Crane Foundation and the other from Patuxent. One juvenile
raised at the Calgary Zoo was shipped to Patuxent and socialized into
a cohort. Both cohorts easily met the target size of between 6 and 9 that
seem to lead to higher survival.
The role
of infectious bursal disease virus in the health of whooping cranes in
Florida continued. In conclusion, it appears that IBD is a major factor
predisposing juvenile whooping cranes to mortality in Florida in certain
winters. Over 300 samples were tested, including some from the captive
centers prior to shipping birds to Florida. It turns out that the cranes
are exposed to IBD in captivity, but also the prevalence of seropositive
birds increases dramatically in the Florida release pen and post-release
in Florida. This means the whooping cranes are likely exposed in Florida
and continue to be re-exposed. Testing of samples continues, and samples
collected from sentinel chickens, wild turkeys, quail and sandhill cranes
will also be tested. Kristi Candelora will be starting her Master's project
on IBD in Florida.
Survival
of the birds released in the 2002-03 and 2003-04 winters continued to
be excellent. Water levels at the end of 2003 were fair. Four nests were
documented at the end of February, 2004.
Patuxent
Wildlife Research Center is working on an adaptive management study for
the Florida whooping crane population that should be an invaluable tool
to assess the reintroduction. Patuxent met with Steve Nesbitt at Patuxent
for 1-½ days to make progress on the adaptive management study.
Clint Moore and Mike Runge met with the Recovery Team in January. They
hope to have a draft report completed at the end of 2004.
WHOOPING
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP (WCEP)
WCEP had an excellent third year of the eastern migratory whooping
crane reintroduction. Since 2001, 36 whooping cranes have been reintroduced
successfully and are migrating along a well-defined migration corridor
between Wisconsin and Florida. Survival of whooping cranes after completion
of their first fall migration behind ultralight aircraft has been 92%.
The migration
with 16 juveniles in 2003 was beset by bad weather with many delays, but
the migration team perservered and completed the 1,191-mile migration
in 54 days. A highlight was a record 196-mile flight in three hours and
four minutes over Georgia. It was the longest flight in one day ever made
by an ultralight leading cranes. Nineteen of 20 older birds in the flyway
all migrated back to Florida, with one bird in an unknown location because
of a failed transmitter. Although many of the cranes returned to the release
site at Chassahowitzka, they subsequently dispersed to freshwater marsh
habitat in western and northern Florida. Several are within 10 miles of
nonmigratory whooping cranes, but no interactions have been documented
between the two flocks. Four older migratory cranes are currently wintering
in the release site at Chassahowitzka with the cohort of 16 juveniles,
kept there by the rations provided in the pen. It is becoming clear that
although the saltmarsh at Chassahowitzka is not suitable crane habitat,
it is excellent as a first-winter release site.
The WCEP
Outreach Team continued to work with media, organizations, school children
and the general public to provide information and educational opportunities
about whooping cranes and the reintroduction. Media and public interest
continued to be strong, with over 300 media inquiries handled. Websites
for WCEP and project partners (especially Journey North) fielded over
6 million hits. The Outreach Team emphasized educational opportunities
this year and made presentations to over 15,000 people. A very successful
festival was held in the fall at the Necedah NWR in Wisconsin, and an
emotional and well-attended arrival event was organized at Chassahowitzka
NWR. Booths were staffed at the Midwest Birding Symposium in Green Bay
(Sept. 9-11), the Florida Birding and Nature Festival in St. Petersburg,
(Oct. 10-12), and the Colonial Coast Birding Festival in Jekyll Island,
Georgia (Oct. 10-12). The team also assisted with the creation of a WCEP
display for a new exhibit at the Smithsonian Institute's Museum of Natural
History in Washington, D.C. "America's Wildest Places: Our National
Wildlife Refuge System" which opened Nov. 7, 2003 to celebrate the
refuge system's centennial.
The Monitoring
Team did a remarkable job of knowing where almost all the birds were throughout
the summer, fall migration, and winter, and helping the juveniles survive
in the Florida release pen. The project budget (funds outside ordinary
operating budgets) in 2003 was $1.2 million, with nearly half coming from
private organizations.
The Health
team was involved in almost all facets of the reintroduction, providing
health care before and after releases. In 2003, 16 of 19 whooping cranes
(84%) allocated to the project made the migration and were released. Of
particular note was a juvenile in Wisconsin with a small knee fracture
that was surgically repaired. A hardware foreign body (a washer) was also
removed from its gizzard during surgery. Recovery was accomplished in
isolation at ICF, and the bird reunited with the migration cohort in southern
Wisconsin. The bird began flying with the cohort in northern Illinois
and completed the migration with no problems. This is just one example
of the numerous situations the health team deals with on a 24/7/365 basis.
A WCEP planning
meeting was held February 18-20th in Crystal River, Florida. This is one
of two annual meetings where 30+ participants from the various WCEP teams
gather to discuss both short-term and long-term needs. The Wisconsin DNR
is leading an effort to write a State management plan for whooping cranes
that will be a useful tool in writing a similar plan for the entire flock.
For 2004,
the Recovery team has approved allocation of up to 20 chicks for the ultralight
migration. In addition, plans are proceeding for a possible supplemental
release where captive whooping crane juveniles would be released into
groups of older whooping cranes in the fall, 2005.
CAPTIVE
FLOCKS
The captive flocks are the heart and soul of the whooping crane reintroduction
program. An endless amount of work goes into propagating cranes, caring
for the chicks, training them for reintroductions, and dealing with numerous
health issues. I cannot begin to detail all the invaluable work that the
captive centers carry out. Below are just a few of the highlights.
AUDUBON
CENTER for RESEARCH on ENDANGERED SPECIES (ACRES)
ACRES was allocated $1.2 million in the Department of the Interior's
appropriations bill for funding a new whooping crane captive propagation
facility designed to hold 10 pairs. They deserve all the credit for making
this happen and getting it funded. ACRES currently propagates Mississippi
sandhill cranes and has 8 whooping cranes, including one pair that laid
its first eggs in 2003. The new funding will expand the whooping crane
program at ACRES, provide much better facilities separate from the sandhills,
and eliminate the current conflict for space between the two species.
Larger breeding pens with breeding ponds will be built, two factors that
we think are limiting the captive propagation effort for whooping cranes.
This new facility should help meet the recovery goal of an expansion of
the captive flock needed to be able to retain 90% of the gene diversity
in captivity for the next 100 years. It will hopefully be built and ready
to shelter cranes in 2 years.
A pair of
whooping cranes at the Audubon Park Zoo in New Orleans was recently put
on public display. The zoo has received funding for a new whooping crane
exhibit at the zoo's front entrance, which should allow the species and
the history of whooping cranes in Louisiana to be highlighted.
CALGARY
The Calgary Zoo fledged 2 chicks in 2003. One was kept for exhibit
at the main zoo, and 1 was shipped to Patuxent on October 15th for socialization
into a cohort going to the Florida non-migratory flock. The zoo staff
did an excellent job working through the usual stress related to permitting
issues whenever a CITES species has to cross an international border.
INTERNATIONAL
CRANE FOUNDATION (ICF)
ICF in their best year ever raised 8 chicks and socialized them
into a cohort shipped to Florida. One egg was transported to Patuxent
for inclusion in the ultralight project, although the chick later showed
health problems and died in February. Three chicks were kept back for
genetic reasons as replacement birds for captivity.
ICF remained
heavily involved supporting the Wisconsin to Florida whooping crane
reintroduction. ICF personnel monitored the released birds throughout
the year, including migration periods. They provided veterinary and
crane keeper staff to Necedah NWR throughout the summer, were on the
migration team, and cared for the cranes at the release pen in Florida
throughout the winter.
LOWRY
PARK ZOO
Lowry
Park Zoo provides invaluable help to the whooping crane recovery program
providing medical help for injured birds in Florida. One crane pulled
from the wild undergoing rehabilitation from chronic respiratory problems
underwent "cold" laser surgery at a cardiac unit in a local
hospital to clear an obstruction in the trachea. Extraordinary innovation
and effort went into this case. The laser procedure was a success, but
the bird died 24 hours after the procedure from mycotic pneumonia. My
thanks go out to all the medical personnel involved. The pair of whooping
cranes on permanent exhibit at Lowry Park is doing fine.
USGS
PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER (PATUXENT)
In
2003, Patuxent successfully raised 17 chicks for the ultralight project,
and 7 chicks for the Florida nonmigratory flock, to which they added
one juvenile from the Calgary Zoo. Two additional chicks were held back
for genetic reasons to become future breeders. Patuxent also raised
18 sandhill crane chicks for a West Nile Virus study. Operations are
complex and require an extremely dedicated staff. Hurricane Isabel in
the fall that knocked out power for several days added to an already
difficult job.
Patuxent
has several technician and scientist vacancies that need to be filled.
Long-time crane behaviorist David Ellis is retiring. His contributions,
innovations, and friendship will be missed.
SAN
ANTONIO ZOO
The
two pairs at the San Antonio Zoo produced 2 eggs that were transported
to Patuxent where chicks hatched and were assigned to the ultralight
project. This was the first year San Antonio contributed cranes to the
Eastern Partnership, but it meant they did not costume-raise any chicks
for the Florida nonmigratory flock this year.
WHOOPING
CRANE NUMBERS / February 29, 2004
| Wild
Populations |
Adult |
Young |
Total |
Adult
Pairs |
| Aransas/Wood
Buffalo NP |
169 |
25 |
194 |
64 |
| Rocky
Mountains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Florida
non-migratory |
64 |
18 |
82* |
17 |
| Wisconsin/Florida
migratory |
20 |
16 |
36 |
0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal
in the Wild |
253
|
59 |
312 |
81 |
|
*This
number is a minimum estimate since not all whooping cranes in Florida
can be located on a regular basis.
|
| Captive
Populations |
Adult |
Young |
Total
|
Breeding
Pairs |
| Patuxent
WRC, Maryland |
49
|
1
|
50
|
10
|
| International
Crane Foundation, WI |
29
|
3***
|
32
|
10
|
| Devonian
Wildlife Conservation Center/Calgary |
17
|
1
|
18
|
6
|
| ACRES,
New Orleans |
8
|
0
|
8
|
0
|
| New
Orleans Zoo |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
| San
Antonio Zoo, Texas |
6
|
0***
|
6
|
2
|
| Homosassa
Springs Wildlife State Park |
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Lowery
Park Zoo, Tampa, Florida |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal
in Captivity |
114
|
5
|
119
|
28
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| TOTALS
(Wild + Captive) 312 + 119 = 431 |
|
|
|
|
| ** Young
produced in 2003 that were kept in captivity because of valuable genetics.
Other young not listed went to reintroductions in the eastern U.S.
***
ICF and the San Antonio Zoo both produced eggs in 2003 that were
transported to Patuxent.
|
Home
|