|
International
Whooping Crane Recovery Team
WHOOPING CRANE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES
October
2004 - March 2005
By
Tom Stehn
USFWS Whooping Crane Coordinator

photo by USFWS; Joel Trick
|
PDF
Version
CONTENTS
HIGHLIGHTS
ARANSAS
- WOOD BUFFALO
Fall
Migration 2004
Platte River
Aransas National Wildlife Refuge
MISCELLANEOUS
Recovery
Plan Revision
Specimens
Genetics
Louisiana
Crane Vocalizations
Blowing Rocks Exhibit
Errata
WHOOPING
CRANE CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
FLORIDA
WHOOPING
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP
CAPTIVE
FLOCKS
WHOOPING
CRANE NUMBERS - MARCH 22, 2005
HIGHLIGHTS
The Aransas-Wood Buffalo population surpassed the 200 barrier for
the first time in presumably over 100 years with 217 whooping cranes arriving
in Texas. Included were a record 34 juveniles, including 2 sets of twins,
from a record production season in Canada. One juvenile crane separated
from its parents in the fall migration and wintered about 75 miles north
of Aransas. One of the twin chicks and one adult died while at Aransas,
leaving the flock in spring, 2005 estimated at 215 cranes, an increase
of 22 from the 193 alive in spring, 2004. Whooping crane numbers at the
end of March, 2005, both captive (127) and wild (326), totaled a record
453.
Records for group size reported in the fall migration were set at Muskiki
Lake, Saskatchewan (17) and Salt Plains NWR, Oklahoma (32). These groups
were the largest ever recorded during migration in Canada and the U.S.
It is a conservative estimate that as many as a record 93 individual whooping
cranes were observed at Salt Plains and in the immediate area in the fall,
with 62 individual cranes stopping at the Quivira NWR and immediate vicinity
in Kansas. On December 1, two adult cranes were confirmed present in a
flock of 100,000 sandhill cranes by Refuge Biologist Jude Smith at Grulla
NWR just a few miles across the border into New Mexico between Clovis
and Portales. These were the first whooping cranes from the Aransas-Wood
Buffalo flock ever confirmed in New Mexico.
Three white-plumaged
whooping cranes were shot at near the Quivira NWR in central Kansas on
November 6th, the opening morning of the goose and sandhill crane season.
Two injured whooping cranes sighted by landowners were picked up and intensive
efforts made to treat extensive injuries. One bird had to have a leg amputated
and died three days later. The second bird, after being flown to Patuxent
and showing promise of recovery, died 33 days after the shooting from
a respiratory infection connected with its injuries, including a broken
wing. Extensive heroic efforts to save these two cranes were made by staff
at Kansas State University and the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.
Following an investigation, a party of sandhill crane hunters was identified
firing at the three cranes and legal charges are expected to be filed.
The third crane shot at on November 6th delayed its migration, remaining
at Quivira NWR for over a month. It may have resumed migration on December
9th, but it was never reported by anyone in migration and it is not known
if it survived and made it to Aransas.
The Whooping
Crane Eastern Partnership (WCEP) team trained 14 more juvenile whooping
cranes for the fall migration. The migration using ultralight aircraft
of just over 1,200 miles was completed in 64 days with 13 cranes arriving
safely at the Chassahowitzka NWR on the west coast of Florida. One juvenile
in autumn was released directly into a group of older whooping cranes
and successfully followed cranes to Florida.
The year
2004 was a positive one for the captive flocks that fledged 30 chicks.
Production was used to supply the eastern migratory reintroduction (15),
the Florida nonmigratory population (5), a solo release in central Wisconsin
(1), genetic holdbacks as future breeders (6), and one holdback as a display
bird. Genetic goals of the captive flocks were fully met in 2004, with
several very valuable chicks produced. Numbers for reintroductions were
less than hoped for, but met projected targets.
ARANSAS
- WOOD BUFFALO
Fall
Migration , 2004
Whooping crane spring and fall migrations are monitored annually.
Sighting reports are forwarded to the Ecological Services Field Office
of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Grand Island, Nebraska, where
they are compiled by Wally Jobman.
The first dates recorded for confirmed observations of migrating whooping
cranes were September 1 in Canada and October 2 in the United States.
The last sighting date was December 1. Sightings were reported from
Saskatchewan (41); Alberta (2); Manitoba, (2); North Dakota (18); South
Dakota (3); Nebraska (2); Colorado (1); Kansas (23); Oklahoma (17);
Texas (4); and New Mexico (1). Weather during September and October,
2004, was seasonable across the Great Plains. Major cold fronts moved
through the northern and central Great Plains on October 1, 13, 29,
and November 1. As a result of the October 29 and November 1 storm systems,
a major sandhill and whooping crane migration occurred from October
31 to November 4. Thirty-five whooping cranes were reported in Kansas
on November 5 and 6, and 35 were also reported at Salt Plains NWR, Oklahoma
on November 6 and 7. The last confirmed sighting in North Dakota was
on November 4, and no confirmed sightings were reported north of Kansas
after November 5. (This paragraph was paraphrased from the Fall 2004
Cooperative Whooping Crane Tracking Project by Wally Jobman.)
Large groups
of whooping cranes were reported at Muskiki Lake, Saskatchewan (17)
and Salt Plains NWR, Oklahoma (32). These groups were the largest ever
recorded during migration in Canada and the U.S. It is a conservative
estimate that as many as a record 93 individual whooping cranes (77
adults & 16 young) were observed at Salt Plains and in the immediate
area this fall, many recorded by the efforts of volunteer Ann Wilbur.
Unexpected
migration events included a lone juvenile whooping crane separated from
its parents reported in eastern Colorado in early November and in Tillman
County, Oklahoma in mid-November that spent the winter with sandhills
in Matagorda County, Texas about 70 miles northeast of Aransas. On December
1, two adult cranes were confirmed present by Refuge Biologist Jude
Smith in a flock of 100,000 sandhill cranes at Grulla NWR just a few
miles across the border into New Mexico between Clovis and Portales.
These were the first whooping cranes from the Wood Buffalo-Aransas flock
ever confirmed in New Mexico.
Three white-plumaged whooping cranes were shot at near the Quivira NWR
in central Kansas on November 6th, the opening morning of the goose
and sandhill crane season. Whooping cranes normally leave the refuge
during the day and are exposed to hunting pressure on surrounding private
lands. There were about 200,000 sandhills and 300,000 geese at Quivira
at the time of the incident. Twenty-two whooping cranes were roosting
at Quivira NWR and environs that morning. Duck season had opened the
week before. The refuge has been closed to waterfowl hunting daily starting
October 23rd in a special closure due to the presence of the whooping
cranes.
Following
reports received from landowners, two injured whooping cranes were captured
by staff of Quivira NWR and a State of Kansas biologist. Both birds
were driven to Manhatten, Kansas three hours away to the vet hospital
at Kansas State University. The leg on one of the birds was hanging
by a tendon and was amputated by a surgical team late that first night.
The second bird had a fractured wing with the humerus exposed. Surgery
was performed early the following morning and the bone pinned back together.
I am very grateful for the tremendous effort Dr. Jim Carpenter and staff
at the Kansas Veterinary Hospital made to do every thing possible for
these two birds. Dr. Carpenter's background includes time as the veterinarian
at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center and he is an expert working
with whooping cranes.
USFWS puts
out two news releases, first about finding the injured cranes and the
second acknowledging the cranes had been shot. Following an investigation
of several days, a party of sandhill crane hunters was identified firing
at the three cranes. Charges are expected to be filed.
The bird with the amputated leg died on November 9th. The second bird
with a broken wing and 11 pellets lodged in its body was flown to Patuxent
on a State of Kansas aircraft on November 18th. It resumed eating natural
foods and seemed to be doing better adapting to captivity, but a respiratory
problem developed from the injuries and the bird had to be euthanized.
It received excellent care from Dr. Glenn Olsen and the entire crane
staff at Patuxent, but the injuries were just too much to overcome.
I cannot overemphasize the tremendous amount of effort put into trying
to save these two cranes. Both carcasses were sent to the National Wildlife
Forensic Laboratory in Ashland, Oregon as part of the law enforcement
investigation.
All but
one of the whooping cranes present at Quivira NWR on the day of the
shooting continued their migration and left the area. One whooping crane,
believed to have been the 3rd crane shot at, flew back to the refuge
where it remained. It flew less than usual but no obvious injuries were
apparent. It was still present on December 9th with limited areas of
water still open. It may have resumed migration shortly thereafter,
but it was never reported by anyone in migration and it is not known
whether it survived and arrived at Aransas.
Quivira
NWR had 62 different whooping cranes stop there this fall. It always
receives high whooping crane usage and is legally designated as Critical
Habitat. USFWS must work closely with the State of Kansas so that a
better job is done implementing the Contingency Plan for Federal-State
Cooperative Protection of Whooping Cranes. Quivira NWR is one of the
absolute most important migration stopover areas for whooping cranes,
and the whoopers need to receive 100% protection both on the refuge
and in surrounding areas.
PLATTE
RIVER, NEBRASKA
Continued drought affected the Platte River throughout the summer.
In the fall migration, only one whooping crane group was confirmed using
the Platte River.
Wally Jobman
of the USFWS Endangered Species office in Grand Island, Nebraska retired
on March 3 after 30 years of tremendous help compiling whooping crane
migration sightings, managing the sighting database, and working on
Platte River issues. Martha Tacha in the same office has stepped in
to head the whooping crane migration sighting network for the Central
Flyway.
ARANSAS
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE
The
first two whooping cranes arrived at Aransas on October 12, four days
ahead of the average first arrival. Eighty-seven percent of the arrivals
at Aransas (i.e., 187 birds) occurred between November 3 and November
24. A record 216 cranes made it to Aransas, including a record 33 juveniles
with two sets of twins. A news release was put out at the end of November
by USFWS-Region 2 resulting in nationwide publicity.
A record 34th juvenile and 217th crane in the flock wintered with sandhills
north of the refuge near Bay City in Matagorda County. The peak population
of 217 consisted of an estimated 142 adult, 41subadults and 34 chicks,
surpassing the previous high of 194 in the fall of 2003. Eleven adult/subadult
cranes failed to arrive at Aransas and were listed as mortality between
spring and fall, 2004. One adult whooping crane and one juvenile from
one of the two sets of twins died during the winter, leaving the estimated
flock size at 215. Habitat conditions were generally favorable for the
cranes during the winter, although crab populations were quite low December
through February. Salinities were low throughout the winter and the
whooping cranes remained in the salt marsh and/or utilized nearby prescribed
burns.
MISCELLANEOUS
RECOVERY
PLAN REVISION
The
draft whooping crane recovery plan was finalized and approved by the
Interior Department on Dec. 17th after some last minute changes. The
plan was published January 11th in the Federal Register, and is available
on the web site www.fws.gov. The 60-day public comment period closed
March 11th with comments directed to Tom Stehn.
SPECIMENS
Various specimens were shipped to locations in the U.S. in the last
6 months.
In October, Texas Parks and Wildlife Department shipped a specimen unsuitable
for use as a taxidermy mount to the U. of Wisconsin-Madison where its
skeleton was salvaged. Crane skulls, feet, and feathers were sent by
FLFWCC and by Patuxent to Necedah NWR for use in the crane education
trunks. Cranes found dead in South Carolina (November) and Alabama (January)
were shipped to the U. of Florida in Gainesville and the National Wildlife
Forensics Lab, respectively for necropsy.
WHOOPING
CRANE RECOVERY TEAM
The Whooping Crane Captive Management and Recovery Team meetings
were held February 8-10 at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center in
Laurel, Maryland. Patuxent did an excellent job hosting the meeting
at their wonderful facilities. Approximately 50 people attended, I think
the biggest turnout ever for a Whooping Crane Recovery Team meeting.
Highlights were a very well-orchestrated tour of the crane breeding
facility and excellent discussions by people working on so many different
aspects of whooping crane recovery. The next meeting of the Recovery
Team will be held February 6-7, 2006 in Zacatecas, Mexico in conjunction
with the North American Crane Workshop on February 8-10.
GENETICS
In the past five years, there has been a major change incorporating
genetics into management decisions for whooping cranes. Pairs in both
captivity and in the wild are not passing on genetic material evenly.
The genetics of the eastern migratory whooping crane population is especially
limited with 85% of the population derived from only five captive pairs.
That population is also skewed with more males present. In Florida,
four of the nesting pairs are full siblings. Decisions which include
a genetic component will be made for every chick produced in captivity
to try to maximize genetic diversity in both captive and reintroduced
populations.
LOUISIANA
Dr.
Sammy King of the Louisiana Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit - USGS
is planning research projects on crane issues in Louisiana, including
determining the summer range of sandhill cranes that winter in Louisiana.
Additional habitat assessment studies would be done at White Lake for
a possible nonmigratory whooping crane population and at Marsh Island
as a wintering site for a possible migratory flock.
CRANE
VOCALIZATIONS
Dr.
Bernhard Wessling reported to the Recovery Team on his analysis of whooping
crane vocalizations recorded in recent years by Brian Johns and Lea
Craig-Moore in Wood Buffalo and by Colleen Satyshur and Nick Anich at
Aransas. Dr. Wessling has matched the summer and winter calls of 21
pairs. He is continuing to work on possible genetic relationships of
vocalizations, comparing genetic kinship with similarity of voice prints.
EXHIBIT
AT BLOWING ROCKS
The
Nature Conservancy's Blowing Rocks Preserve in Hobe Sound, Florida opened
an exhibit entitled "Whooping Cranes: The Journey to Save a Species".
The exhibit ran from October 15 to February 26 at their Hawley Education
Center.
ERRATA
In the last biannual report, I reported that Canus sired 186
chicks. He was a super-sire, but that would have been REALLY super.
Actually, he sired 36 chicks. At the time of his death, he had 186 descendents,
which included 147 "grand offspring" and 3 "great-grand
offspring".
WHOOPING
CRANE CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION (WCCA)
The
WCCA with over 600 members has a 45-year history as a watch-dog for whooping
crane conservation. They do effective lobbying on whooping crane issues
and many educational activities. Projects they have recently funded have
included studies at both Aransas and Wood Buffalo, supporting a water
conservation foundation in Texas, and purchasing a power point projector
for WCEP. The organization's president in 2005 is Walt Sturgeon. Their
next meeting is to be held in Louisiana in January or February, 2006.
FLORIDA
The current population for the nonmigratory whooping crane flock in
Florida is estimated at 66 birds. A few additional birds may be alive
in unknown locations. A number of birds shifted back and forth between
the two whooper population centers 102 km apart in Polk and Lake Counties.
In 2004, a record 12 whooping crane pairs nested in Florida, but hatching
success was poor from the 22 eggs and only one chick fledged. Survival
of the 16 birds released in the 2003-04 winter was good with 3 mortalities
recorded. Five cranes were shipped from ICF to Polk County in central
Florida on December 8th. These birds were placed in a small pen and kept
from flying by wing brails until released on December 22nd. Shortly after
they left the pen, a whooper pair from across the ranch started associating
with the new birds. One of the five was taken by a bobcat in March. The
first whooping crane nest of 2005 was found on January 27th and three
additional nests found by mid-March.
The Recovery
Team at the annual meeting in February decided to place the Florida reintroduction
on hold for one year to further assess high rates of adult mortality and
low productivity. Adult mortality has averaged 15% with 12 mortalities
recorded in 2004 and January, 2005. A few eggs or individual birds may
be shipped to Florida from captivity in 2005 depending on production,
but there are no plans to form large release cohorts.
Two additional
whooping crane strikes of power lines were recorded in the same area of
Florida where collisions have been documented previously. One resulted
in mortality, and one bird had its radio transmitter knocked off when
hitting the line but the bird seemed okay. The power company was urged
to mark the lines in question and have ordered materials to get this done.
Collision with power lines remains the largest human-caused source of
mortality for fledged whooping cranes. In Florida, 12 whooping crane mortalities
from power line strikes have been documented.
Florida researchers continued looking at blood samples for exposure to
Infectious Bursal Disease. Scientists at the Patuxent Wildlife Research
Center continued work on their Adaptive Management Model for the Florida
nonmigratory flock. They presented results and received input at the Recovery
Team meeting and hope to have a draft report done in January, 2006.
WHOOPING
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP (WCEP)
WCEP is carrying out a multi-year whooping crane reintroduction project
in eastern North America. The goal of the project is to establish a self-sustaining
population of at least 125 birds (i.e. 25 breeding pairs). Starting in
2001, captive-raised juvenile whoopers have been costume-raised, isolated
from human environments and conditioned to follow ultralight aircraft.
There are currently 45 birds in the eastern migratory whooping crane population.
A few birds will reach breeding age in 2005 and it is hoped that nesting
will occur.
In the fall,
the ultralight migration team led 14 whooping cranes from Wisconsin to
Florida. The trip lasted 64 days and covered 1,200 miles. Bad weather
unsuitable for flying kept the team pinned down for long stretches on
several occasions. One crane became sick and died from Eastern Equine
Encephalitis virus at the final stop of the migration before the arrival
at Chassahowitzka NWR. This virus is normally transmitted by mosquitoes
and can be fatal for birds, horses, and humans. It rarely causes death
in sandhill cranes, but whooping cranes seem to be more susceptible. While
at stopovers in southern Georgia and/or northern Florida, several of the
whoopers may have contracted the virus as evidenced by changes in their
blood chemistry monitored during health exams. The Florida Department
of Health noted viral transmission to sentinel chickens in nearby counties
during the time that the whooping cranes were moving through the area.
One other whooping crane was noted to have been temporarily ill but recovered.
In Wisconsin,
one juvenile whooping crane dropped out of the flight training program
due to abnormal development of flight feathers. By the time the pulled
feathers had re-grown correctly, it was too late to train the bird to
follow the ultralight. This crane (# 18-04) was released the last week
in October by direct autumn release into groups of older whooping cranes
that led him on his first migration. Between November 7th and January
3rd, it at times flew solo, but mostly crane 18-04 successfully followed
sandhills and/or whoopers to the release pen at Chassahowitzka and then
continued on to nearby Pasco County. His migration included a 5-week stopover
at Hiwassee Wildlife Refuge in Tennessee with six other whoopers. No.
18-04 is the first whooping crane in the eastern migratory population
to make his first migration following older cranes rather than ultralight
aircraft. With the apparent success of this direct autumn release, the
Recovery Team has endorsed a proposal to try this with up to eight juvenile
birds in 2005.
The migration
of the older whooping cranes in the eastern flyway was delayed by the
lack of arctic weather systems that help push them south. A major departure
occurred on November 6th with 15 older cranes leaving the summering area.
Three older whooping cranes did not leave Wisconsin until the second week
in December as the ultralight migration team was arriving at Chassahowitzka,
with just three of the older cranes in Florida at the time. The last 3
whooping cranes to leave Wisconsin completed the migration to the Chassahowitzka
pen site in only 5 days.
The late
migration of the older birds caused problems for management of the juvenile
whooping cranes at the Chassahowitzka release pen. Aggression from older
birds can disrupt roosting and feeding of the younger cranes and make
them susceptible to predation by bobcats. The older birds, once they return
to Chassahowitzka, usually move on to winter elsewhere if no pelleted
food is available to them at the release pen. With most of the older cranes
still situated north of the migration team that was poised to arrive at
Chassahowitzka, there was much discussion of "parking" the juveniles
away from Chassahowitzka for up to two weeks to give the older birds an
opportunity to complete their migration and move on through Chassahowitzka.
However, because of the unknowns associated with the movements of the
older birds, it was decided to take the youngsters directly to Chassahowitzka.
A small exclosure was built at the pen site to keep the young birds away
from the older birds and keep food away from older birds. This arrangement
worked, but the presence of older birds for long periods kept the juveniles
penned up more than desired and limited their time acclimating to the
wild in the open release pen. By February, the ultralight juveniles were
able to spend more time out of the exclosure and hopefully learned important
survival skills.
The wintering
areas selected by the older whooping cranes did not go as expected. Some
of these birds wintered off of the expected migration corridor in North
Carolina (n=3) and South Carolina (n=7). Included in these "stray"
birds were the cranes that had summered in Michigan. Four older whoopers
short-stopped to winter in Tennessee. Nineteen wintered in Florida. A
decision was reached not to capture any of the "stray" birds
and return them to Florida, but to see where they would migrate to in
the spring of 2005. The Recovery Team is concerned about birds returning
to a core release area in central Wisconsin in summer to promote pairing.
However, if sufficient pairing occurs, then a wider ranging population
within the area designated as experimental nonessential for the eastern
whooping cranes would be okay.
Two older
whooping cranes died during the fall migration. One was a crane apparently
taken by a bobcat at the Cape Romain National Seashore in South Carolina.
The second was a bird that died in Limestone County, Alabama on Dec 23rd.
This latter incident is still under investigation. A third older whooper
and one of the juveniles were taken by bobcats at Chassahowitzka when
they roosted outside the pen. This left 45 whooping cranes in the eastern
migratory population.
One of the
migratory whooping cranes old enough to pair up (# 6-01) spent about three
weeks in December in Lake County occasionally associating with a flock
of the nonmigratory Florida whooping cranes. This was the first documented
"mixing" of the two flocks. No detrimental behaviors were observed
during these interactions, and crane # 6-01 actually seemed to prefer
the company of sandhills than the other whoopers.
The Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources in November, faced with major budget cuts,
targeted the whooping crane coordinator's position as one of 106 positions
to be cut. After a rapid public and agency outcry, Wisconsin decided to
retain the whooping crane position, once again proving the power of partnership.
The annual
winter WCEP meeting was held at Homosassa Springs State Wildlife Park,
Florida on January 26-28. The biannual face-to-face meetings in September
and January are very important for planning purposes and team unity. Items
addressed included 1) moving the ultralight migration route to the west
to avoid mountain weather; 2) changes in winter pen management and/or
location to deal with the older cranes interacting with the juveniles;
3) future genetic management and a skewed sex ratio of reintroduced birds;
4) initiation of direct autumn release technique; and 5) difficulty meeting
project funding needs.
The WCEP
communications and outreach team continued its hectic pace maintaining
web sites that attracted over 7 million visits, running information booths
at fairs, conferences, and festivals in AZ, FL, GA, MD, TN, TX, and WI,
hosting VIP tours, dealing with hundreds of media, and doing environmental
education in the schools.
WCEP co-chairman
John Christian representing the nine founding member agencies and non-profit
organizations that comprise WCEP received an honor award from the Whooping
Crane Conservation Association for efforts to safeguard the whooping crane.
Joe Duff representing Operation Migration also received an honor award.
The awards were presented at the annual meeting of the WCCA in Titusville,
Florida on November 19th. Speakers at the festival included John French
of Patuxent, Brian Johns (CWS), John Christian and Tom Stehn (USFWS).
CAPTIVE
FLOCKS
The
year 2004 was a positive one for the captive flocks, with 30 total chicks
fledged. Six were held back in captivity because of their valuable genetics.
This fully met the planned for flock expansion to meet genetic goals.
Production was used to supply the eastern migratory reintroduction (16)
and the Florida nonmigratory population (5). For production totals and
other activities of the captive whooping crane breeding facilities in
2004, please refer to my March-September 2004 biannual report available
on-line at www.bringbackthecranes.org.
Improvements
were made to crane pens at Patuxent, Lowry Park, and San Antonio. Construction
was started on new breeding pens at SSC and a new isolation rearing facility
at ICF.
The Calgary
Zoo shipped two birds to ICF in October. Unfortunately, one of the two
birds later died in an accident getting caught in the flight netting while
in quarantine at ICF. At the San Antonio Zoo, one of their females (Buffy)
died unexpectedly on November 22. The death occurred at night during a
period of thunderstorms and flooding rains which were presumably a factor.
A crane currently at Patuxent may be shipped to San Antonio in the fall
to replace Buffy, though this is dependent on a chronic respiratory condition
of this bird.
Keith Gibson
of the Calgary Zoo continued work on his hatchability study. He visited
ICF at the end of November and Patuxent in February to incorporate data
from these two breeding centers into his analysis.
WHOOPING
CRANE NUMBERS / March 22, 2005
| Wild
Populations |
Adult |
Young |
Total |
Adult
Pairs |
| Aransas/Wood
Buffalo NP |
182 |
33 |
215* |
67 |
| Rocky
Mountains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Florida
non-migratory |
61 |
5 |
66** |
13 |
| Wisconsin/Florida
migratory |
32 |
13*** |
45 |
0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal
in the Wild |
275
|
51 |
326 |
80 |
|
*One
chick separated from its parents in migration and wintered in Matagorda
County, Texas. One adult and one chick died at Aransas, so the peak
population for the 2004-05 winter equaled 217.
**
This number is a conservative estimate since not all whooping cranes
in Florida can be located on a regular basis. Five juveniles were
shipped from ICF to Florida on December 8th. One chick fledged in
the wild.
***
These are chicks hatched at Patuxent and have migrated behind ultralights
to Florida (13), or released into the wild solo (1).
|
| Captive
Populations |
Adult |
Young |
Total
|
Breeding
Pairs |
| Patuxent
WRC, Maryland |
51
|
3
|
54
|
13
|
| International
Crane Foundation, WI |
32
|
3
|
35
|
10
|
| Devonian
Wildlife Conservation Center/Calgary |
18
|
1*
|
19
|
6
|
| Species
Survival Center, Belle Chasse |
8
|
1**
|
9
|
1
|
| New
Orleans Zoo |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
| San
Antonio Zoo, Texas |
5
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
| Homosassa
Springs Wildlife State Park |
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Lowery
Park Zoo, Tampa, Florida |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal
in Captivity |
119
|
8
|
127
|
31
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| TOTALS
(Wild + Captive) 326 + 117 = 453 |
|
|
|
|
|
* *
Three chicks fledged. One was held back as a display bird in Calgary
for health
reasons. Two were shipped to ICF on September 30th. One subsequently
died in an
accident. The remaining chick was shipped on to Florida on December
8th.
**Egg
came from the wild Florida nonmigratory flock.
|
Home
|