|
International
Whooping Crane Recovery Team
WHOOPING CRANE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES
April
2005 - September 2005
By
Tom Stehn
USFWS Whooping Crane Coordinator
PDF
Version
CONTENTS
HIGHLIGHTS
ARANSAS
- WOOD BUFFALO
Spring
Migration 2005
Wood Buffalo National Park
Aransas National Wildlife Refuge
CONTINGENCY
PLAN FOR FEDERAL-STATE COOPERATIVE PROTECTION OF WHOOPING CRANES
CRANE
CONSERVATION ACT
RECOVERY
PLAN
FLORIDA
WHOOPING
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP
CAPTIVE
FLOCKS
WHOOPING
CRANE NUMBERS - MARCH 22, 2005
HIGHLIGHTS
Production
in Wood Buffalo National Park was very good with 62 chicks documented
hatching from 58 nests. Mid-August surveys found 31 chicks had survived,
including 2 sets of twins.
Forty-two
whooping cranes make up the migratory eastern whooping crane population.
All but a few are following the correct migration corridor, with most
returning to the core release area. Nesting occurred for the first time
in the migratory reintroduction as the initial cohorts of birds are just
reaching breeding age. Five pairs showed initial nesting behavior, and
2 pairs laid eggs at Necedah National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). Both pairs
quickly lost their eggs presumably to predators. Twenty-four additional
juveniles are being trained to enter the population in the fall.
Seven sandhill
crane hunters that killed 2 whooping cranes last fall in central Kansas
were each fined $3,000 and lost their hunting privileges for 2 years.
Following this incident, States increased efforts to protect whooping
cranes during hunting season.
The captive
facilities had a very good production season, with 39 total chicks fledged.
Nine were held back in captivity for their valuable genetics to be future
breeding stock. Production was also used to supply 26 birds to the eastern
migratory reintroduction which was very close to targeted goals.
ARANSAS
- WOOD BUFFALO
Spring
Migration, 2005
The following is from the Cooperative Whooping Crane Tracking
Project report written by Dr. Martha Tacha, USFWS Endangered Species
office in Grand Island, Nebraska.
"Departures
from Aransas in spring, 2005 appeared about average, with 180 cranes
(84%) departing Aransas between March 23 and April 13. Of these, 127
(57% of the population of 215) departed between April 6 and April 13.
All but one whooping crane, an injured juvenile, had migrated by April
27. The injured juvenile that failed to migrate with its parents apparently
recovered from its injuries and remained at Aransas during the summer.
The first
dates for confirmed observations of whooping cranes were March 12 in
the United States and April 9 in Canada. The last sighting date was
May 25 in North Dakota (a juvenile), and April 29 in Canada. Sightings
were reported from Kansas (9), Nebraska (5), North Dakota (4), Montana
(1), and Saskatchewan (13). A cluster of 7 sightings in central Kansas
from April 11 to April 13 likely were a result of increased activity
of hunters and conservation officers associated with the opening day
of turkey season in the state on April 13. Duration of recorded stopovers
ranged from 1 to 6 days, averaging approximately 1.7 days.
The spring
migration included notable sightings of adventurous (or unfortunate)
lone juveniles. In addition to the injured juvenile summering at Aransas,
the earliest sighting (on March 12) was of a lone juvenileA in Kansas,
and the last sighting (May 25) was of a lone juvenile in North Dakota.
The longest stopover recorded this spring in the United States was also
a lone juvenile in Nebraska (6 days, from April 28 to May 2), although
there was also a pair of adults that spent 6 days in Saskatchewan, from
April 10 to April 15."
A This
juvenile had wintered with sandhills near Bay City in Matagorda County,
Texas. It had started migration apparently after all the sandhills had
departed
Texas.
One whooping
crane juvenile may have summered in North Dakota where it was sighted
May 25 and an additional probable sighting reported in July.
WOOD
BUFFALO NATIONAL PARK
Production
in Wood Buffalo National Park was very good in 2005 with 62 chicks,
including 14 sets of twins, documented hatching from 58 nests. Water
levels looked slightly below average and definitely were lower than
optimal. Fourteen pairs failed to nest but were present on territories,
an unusually high number of pairs failing to nest. There was little
production from the Klewi marshes (6 fledged chicks), a location that
usually is excellent but was notably dry at the start of the summer.
These observations supported the correlation between low water levels
and poor chick production. Heavy rains on June 16 and 19 put out forest
fires in the Park and helped the crane habitat, but fell shortly after
the chicks had hatched and caused some mortality of the young chicks.
Aerial photography was completed for parts of the new nesting areas
by Jim Bredy and Chris Lohrengel of USFWS.
Mid-August surveys found 31 chicks had survived, including 2 sets of
twins. More unison call recordings were made of pairs. At least 25 chicks
are expected to arrive at Aransas this fall. This should allow the population
to increase, with 230+ whooping cranes expected to reach Aransas by
December, 2005.
ARANSAS
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, TEXAS
The injured
juvenile that failed to migrate with its parents apparently recovered
from its injuries and remained at Aransas during the summer. It has
a scar on the back of its head where it apparently was hit, possibly
by a snake or raptor. After the injury, the head and neck of the juvenile
had been very swollen, and the bird stopped eating and was lethargic
for about one week. His parents delayed the start of their migration
to mid-April until the juvenile was eating. This whooping crane was
seen by the winning team that tallied 332 species in 5 days on the Great
Texas Birding Classic held after mid-April. The team also saw a sandhill
crane on Galveston Island, and was the only team to see either crane
species.
The first
phase of the Cedar Bayou dredging feasibility study neared completion
in September. Cedar Bayou is a natural pass from the Gulf of Mexico
into whooping crane critical habitat and is important for the movement
of blue crabs to complete their life cycle. It has a history of silting
shut and then being re-opened by tropical storms. It is currently open.
The engineering study selected a preferred alternative that involves
dredging along the mouth of Cedar Bayou, re-opening a channel from Cedar
Bayou into Vinson Slough, and putting all dredge material about ¼-mile
out into the Gulf to create a delta. Funding has been applied for to
complete the second phase of the study that will include engineering
specifications and address permitting issues.
Plans for
the Lower Guadalupe Water Supply Project (LGWSP) may have changed radically.
The LGWSP planned to build off-channel reservoirs near the mouth of
the Guadalupe River and pump the water back to San Antonio before it
entered San Antonio Bay and whooping crane critical habitat. San Antonio
Water Systems (SAWS) pulled out from supporting the project, instead
choosing to rely on increased pumping in the Edwards Aquifer and bringing
in water from the Colorado River to meet the projected water needs of
San Antonio where the population is projected to double in the next
50 years. It was a combination of political, economic, and environmental
factors that led to their decision to withdraw. Other water developers
are still pursuing LGWSP, and it is still included in the State water
plan. However, SAWS was a major funder (89%) for the project so its
future is uncertain. Two water groups agreed to continue funding the
Texas A & M University study being conducted at Aransas relating
freshwater inflows, blue crabs, and whooping cranes.
A major
re-working of water legislation (Senate Bill 3) failed to pass in the
2005 session of the State legislature. The bill passed the Senate but
was never considered in the House. Proponents hope to modify the bill
and introduce it when the legislature next convenes in 2 years. The
original bill had received widespread support from conservationists
since it had established in-stream flow requirements for Texas rivers.
The whooping
crane brochure entitled "Road to Recovery" was updated, but
funding for printing will have to wait until the new fiscal year starts
in October.
CONTINGENCY
PLAN FOR FEDERAL-STATE COOPERATIVE PROTECTION OF WHOOPING CRANES
A group of
7 sandhill crane hunters was formally charged in September under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act with killing 2 whooping cranes in Kansas last fall. The
Act carries a maximum fine of $15,000 and 6 months in jail. Through plea
agreements, each hunter had to pay a $3,000 fine, collectively pay $2,587
restitution for the veterinary bills for care of the injured birds, perform
50 hours of community service at the Quivira NWR, pass a hunter education
course, and lose hunting privileges for 2 years.
The shooting
of the two whooping cranes led to renewed efforts to protect whooping
cranes, including education of hunters. Oklahoma held meetings with key
folks to discuss implementation of the contingency plan. The Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department completed a "shoot-don't shoot" video
in September aimed at protecting whooping cranes and other non-game species.
Meetings between USFWS and the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks
were held in Kansas on April 18-19 to try to increase protection for whooping
cranes in Central Kansas where the shooting incident took place and whooping
cranes concentrate at Quivira NWR and Cheyenne Bottoms State Wildlife
Area. This meeting led to recommendations that were later adopted by the
agencies involved. Changes included:
- Opening
sandhill crane season in Kansas 4 days later than in 2004, and having
a mid-week opening for the season to reduce hunting pressure.
- Sandhill
crane hunting will open 30 minutes after sunrise rather than at sunrise
through November 30 when whooping cranes are potentially still present.
- An on-line
hunter education course will be created and made mandatory starting
in 2006 for sandhill crane hunters in Kansas.
- Information
about differentiating whooping cranes from look-alike species was put
on a full page in the Kansas regulation book. A new color brochure about
whooping cranes was created, and posters given for license vendors that
sell sandhill crane hunting permits.
- Hunter
education classes were taught in Barton and Stafford counties, with
an emphasis on identification of migratory birds, especially cranes.
The Whooping
Crane Contingency Plan will be updated by March, 2006.
The contingency plan was implemented the last day in September when a
single whooping crane showed up at Long Lake NWR in North Dakota in a
group of sandhills. Hunting on adjacent lands was underway with a firing
line situation next to the refuge. Personnel put up warning signs and
made hunter contacts to urge hunters to know their targets.
CRANE
CONSERVATION ACT
The Crane
Conservation Act was introduced into the Senate on April 28th by Senators
Feingold (D-WI) and Crapo (R-ID) to protect cranes and their habitats.
Co-sponsors included Senators Kohl (D-WI), Martinez (R-FL) and Sarbanes
(D-MD). The bill would allow authorization of up to $5 million a year
for five years for the conservation of threatened crane species and their
ecosystems. Under the Senate language 20% of all annually appropriated
funds will be used in North America and 80% internationally. The bill
was moved forward this summer by sub-committee for consideration by the
full Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
RECOVERY
PLAN
Work was
completed over the summer revising the draft whooping crane recovery plan
published in January, 2005. Data was updated through August, 2005 with
the revised documented finished on September 1. Public comments were considered
with many suggestions incorporated. A formal response to comments was
written and put into an appendix. The final document is currently being
reviewed by USFWS-Region 2.
FLORIDA
There are
approximately 60 whooping cranes in the nonmigratory Florida population
that continues to have problems with mortality. No whooping cranes produced
from the captive centers in 2005 will be reintroduced into the Florida
flock. The breeding season of the whooping cranes in Florida was disappointing.
From the 15 pairs in the population, 8 pairs made 11 nesting attempts.
Only 1 chick hatched but died at 6 days of age. Water levels were good
and sandhill cranes did okay, but the whooping cranes struggled. Examination
of bad eggs revealed either infertility or embryos that had died at an
early stage of development. The lack of genetic diversity of the reintroduced
birds may be having a hand in this, but it is an unknown situation.
Whooping crane pair 591/369, which successfully fledged 2 young in the
past, failed to hatch any chicks this season. Their first nesting attempt
of this season was interrupted by an unpaired whooping crane. The pair
re-nested and then a big rain event flooded that nest. It was early enough
in the season for another re-nesting, but it never happened. Just after
the breeding season the male of the pair was found dead. Necropsy results
indicate the bird died of Eastern Equine Encephalitis (EEE). In the past,
sick birds had been documented with serologic evidence of being infected
with EEE. However, this is the first confirmed mortality from EEE in this
flock. A re-introduced migratory whooping crane had also died of EEE.
That bird died in northern Florida on December 11, 2004A.
A (Paragraph contributed by Marty Folk).
Five of the
Florida nonmigratory flock apparently took a "vacation" trip
and were located at Ace Basin in South Carolina on May 25th. They quickly
moved on and their whereabouts remained unknown. In September, 1 from
the group of 5 was confirmed back in Florida.
WHOOPING
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP (WCEP)
The migratory
whooping cranes for the most part used the proper migration corridor and
summering areas. Of the 42 whooping cranes in the flock at the end of
September, 35 had summered in the core release area in central Wisconsin
on or close to the Necedah NWR, including 30 that usually roosted on Necedah.
Six cranes summered in southeastern Wisconsin. Five hatch year 2003 cranes
migrated off course in the spring of 2005, with 3 reaching Ontario and
2 reaching Michigan. Those 2 in Michigan later made it back to Wisconsin
on their own. The 3 in Ontario separated, with 2 returning to Michigan
where they had been last summer, and the third moving to Vermont and then
New York. The 2 birds Michigan were captured on June 30 and returned to
central Wisconsin where they remained. Three birds in late summer wandered
from Wisconsin to central Minnesota. One female released in 2001 continued
to summer with no other whooping cranes near the Horicon NWR east of the
core reintroduction area.
Nesting occurred
for the first time in the migratory reintroduction as the initial cohorts
of birds reached breeding age. Five pairs built nests and 2 pairs laid
eggs at Necedah NWR. Both nests quickly lost their eggs, presumably to
predators.
There were
3 mortalities between April-September 2005, leaving 42 in the flock (25
males, 17 females). Total losses have been 11 birds out of 53 released
starting in 2001. Losses resulted from predation (7), powerline strike
(1), capture myopathy (1), and 2 mortalities remain under investigation.
The bird that was directly released into the wild last fall and followed
wild cranes to Florida died hitting a power line in Wisconsin in July.
Twenty-six
captive juveniles hatched in 2005 entered "reintroduction" schools.
Twenty-one hatched and trained at the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
were transported to central Wisconsin by Windway Capital Corporation and
trained to follow ultralight aircraft. Five birds hatched at the International
Crane Foundation were driven to Necedah NWR and will be released directly
into groups of wild Wisconsin whooping cranes in the fall. One crane from
each "school" died during the summer, leaving 24 birds to be
added to the wild population.
Fall meetings
of the Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership were held September 19-21 at
Necedah NWR. One of the decisions made was selection of a site called
Halpata Tastanaki Preserve located about 25 miles northeast of Chassahowitzka
NWR in Florida to use as a holding site for an indefinite period if older
whooping cranes have not returned and cleared the release site at Chassahowitzka.
Windway Capital Corporation of Sheboygan, Wisconsin, was presented plaques
of appreciation for all the work they do supporting whooping crane recovery.
They actively take part in transporting eggs between captive breeding
facilities, fly captive juveniles to release sites, and also provide aircraft
and pilots for tracking the eastern population in migration.
The television
show "60 Minutes" aired a segment on the whooping crane eastern
reintroduction. The segment featured Joe Duff of Operation Migration and
what it means to fly with the birds with an ultralight aircraft and reintroduce
them into the wild.
CAPTIVE
FLOCKS
The year 2005 was very positive for the captive flocks with 39 total chicks
fledged. Nine were held back in captivity because of their valuable genetics.
This fully met the planned for flock expansion to meet genetic goals,
although losses from health problems of a few additional very valuable
chicks was frustrating. Production was used to supply 26 birds to the
eastern migratory reintroduction that nearly reached targeted goals.
In the spring,
weekly conference calls were held with flock managers to coordinate efforts
to support reintroductions. Eggs were transported to the USGS Patuxent
Wildlife Research Center from the San Antonio and Calgary zoos, the International
Crane Foundation (ICF), and the Species Survival Center (SSC) in New Orleans
in order to build up a large cohort of similar age needed for the ultralight
training project. Patuxent made modifications to pen facilities to handle
the additional chicks and shipped some late eggs back to ICF. These late
eggs, plus others laid at ICF, formed the basis for providing a cohort
of birds for the direct autumn release (DAR) project. This project involves
isolation rearing whooping cranes, getting them acclimated to natural
habitat as much as possible, and then releasing them in the fall in Wisconsin
into groups of older wild whooping cranes. Birds that entered these reintroduction
programs totaled 21 for the ultralight project and 5 for the DAR. Each
program lost one bird during the summer.
The amount of effort and care that goes into captive breeding of whooping
crane is phenomenal. Efforts start in late winter with changes in diet,
increase in photoperiods, and eliminating disturbance. Artificial insemination
(AI) is carried out on many pairs to ensure improved genetics of offspring
and aid pairs unable to perform natural copulation. Initial clutches are
pulled and in most cases placed under sandhill cranes to get the females
to produce multiple clutches. Most eggs are later moved to incubators
with all kinds of care performed. Health care often includes assisting
in hatching and treating various physical ailments of young chicks. The
environments of the chicks are carefully controlled to reduce disease
threats, and chicks are exercised to promote normal growth. All the breeding
facilities are supported by excellent veterinarians. Some of the highlights
and needs of specific facilities are very briefly touched on below.
- In 2005,
Calgary had success for the first time with their new AI program, and
produced several chicks. In the spring, staffer Cathy Ladiges from Calgary
had traveled to Patuxent and been trained in the finer points of AI.
This is an example of the training sessions that captive facilities
have provided each other to ensure the highest level of staff expertise
possible. Of the 19 whooping cranes at the Devonian Conservation Center
outside Calgary, 7 females laid 21 eggs, of which 9 were fertile and
6 chicks hatched. Calgary ended up with 2 very genetically valuable
chicks this year for the first time.
- The San
Antonio Zoo helped out by shipping eggs to Patuxent and receiving eggs
from Patuxent and ICF in return. They ended up with one very valuable
fledged chick to be a future breeder.
- For the
first time ever, the pair on exhibit at the public Amoco Exhibit at
ICF was given a whooping crane chick to raise. There was much initial
excitement, but the chick died August 25 from a respiratory disease.
The flock of 35 whooping cranes at ICF had 8 females lay 30 fertile
eggs this year, and 21 hatched. Approximately 17 of the chicks fledged.
- Patuxent
holds 54 whooping cranes, with 18 eggs that hatched from 13 producing
pairs in 2005. They also hatched 10 eggs received from other facilities,
and shipped 5 fertile eggs to ICF and San Antonio. With assistance from
staff from Operation Migration, 21 birds were trained to follow ultralights
and were transported by Windway Capital in three different cohorts to
Wisconsin. In the spring, Patuxent prepared facts and figures on their
crane program and assessed potential impacts from a proposed new outer
beltway around Washington DC. One proposed route would place the highway
down Route 197, about ¼ mile from the crane pens. Any project
that forced the cranes at Patuxent to be re-located would be very expensive,
hurt productivity for several years, and might cause some crane mortality.
- The Species
Survival Center in New Orleans shipped eggs to Patuxent and continued
working on plans to build a new captive breeding facility for whooping
cranes. Hurricane Katrina damaged facilities and disrupted operations,
but through some very heroic efforts, the center survived with loss
of only 3 cranes (1 whooper and 2 sandhills). I can only be amazed at
the work of everyone at SSC and what they had to face. Much of the flight
netting for the pens was destroyed by the storm and must be replaced.
Their budgets are totally disrupted with all the tragic events that
have occurred in New Orleans, but people are helping where they can
and the program is continuing. By the end of September, the facility
was operational again with electricity and water. USFWS-Region 4 will
provide $100,000 to keep operations going since the Audubon Institute
which supports SSC has lost its major source of revenue (zoo and aquarium).
WHOOPING
CRANE NUMBERS - SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
| Wild
Populations |
Adult |
Young |
Total |
Adult
Pairs |
| Aransas/Wood
Buffalo NP |
215 |
* |
215* |
73 |
| Rocky
Mountains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Florida
non-migratory |
60** |
5 |
60** |
14 |
| Wisconsin/Florida
migratory |
42 |
24*** |
67 |
2 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal
in the Wild |
317
|
24 |
341 |
89 |
|
*Totals
do not include chicks hatched in June 2005 since chick mortality
is usually high when the chicks are small and there is also no measure
of adult mortality until December 2005. In June, 62 chicks hatched
from 58 nests, but only about half of those chicks are expected
to survive. Thirty-one chicks were documented surviving in mid-
August. The flock total is expected to be > 230 at the end of
the year.
**
This number is an estimate since not all whooping cranes in Florida
can be located on a regular basis. No chicks fledged in the wild
in 2005.
***
These are chicks hatched in captivity and transported to Necedah
NWR in central Wisconsin that are being raised to join the eastern
migratory population.
|
| Captive
Populations |
Adult |
Young* |
Total
|
Breeding
Pairs |
| Patuxent
WRC, Maryland |
54
|
2
|
56
|
13
|
| International
Crane Foundation, WI |
35
|
4
|
39
|
10
|
| Devonian
Wildlife Conservation Center/Calgary |
17
|
3
|
20
|
7
|
| Species
Survival Center, Belle Chasse |
8
|
0
|
8
|
1
|
| New
Orleans Zoo |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
| San
Antonio Zoo, Texas |
5
|
1
|
6
|
1
|
| Homosassa
Springs Wildlife State Park |
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
| Lowery
Park Zoo, Tampa, Florida |
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Subtotal
in Captivity |
126
|
10
|
136
|
32
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| TOTALS
(Wild + Captive) 341 + 136 = 477 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Numbers
are of young remaining at the captive center after eggs and/or birds
were
shipped out for reintroductions in 2005. In most cases, these young
are genetically
valuable and will become future captive breeding stock.
|
Home
|