|
|
WHOOPING CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WHOOPING CRANE REINTRODUCTION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
About WCEP | Hatching & Rearing Cranes | About the Ultralight-led Migration | Direct Autumn Release | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Whooping Crane Recovery TeamWHOOPING CRANE RECOVERY ACTIVITIESOctober 2005 - March 2006 By Tom Stehn - USFWS Whooping Crane Coordinator
CONTENTS
WHOOPING CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP WHOOPING CRANE NUMBERS - April 1, 2006
The National Audubon Society's list of the top ten endangered birds in the continental United States for 2006 has the whooping crane listed third behind the ivory-billed woodpecker and California condor. This shows that whooping cranes still have a long way to travel on the road to recovery.
The 2005-06 winter for the Aransas-Wood Buffalo flock was one of disappointment. Despite the arrival of 30 juveniles including one set of twins in the fall, the total population only reached 220, an increase of 3 birds from the previous winter. Starting in December, food resources were limited and salinities were high, forcing the cranes to make daily flights to fresh water to drink. One 28-year-old male and 5 juveniles died during the winter, leaving the population at 214 in the spring, 2006. This was one bird less than the previous spring.
Twenty-three juvenile whooping cranes were successfully released into the eastern migratory population. Nineteen were flown behind the ultralight on a journey that took 61 days. Four released in the fall in Wisconsin followed other cranes to suitable wintering areas. All migrated back north in the spring. Sixty-four whooping cranes currently make up the migratory eastern whooping crane population. The nonmigratory whooping cranes in Florida had initiated 10 nests as of the first week in April. Three of the nests hatched 4 chicks, with 3 of the chicks currently surviving. Four nests failed, and 3 nests were still being incubated.
Two of the captive flocks had to re-build following nasty weather events. The Species Survival Center in New Orleans had a major clean-up following Hurricane Katrina in August. Patuxent had to repair over 100 pens following a 20-inch snowfall in February.
Journey North is making a difference in educating young people about whooping cranes. One of the nation's premier Internet-based "citizen science" projects, Journey North enables students in 11,000 schools to watch spring sweep across the northern hemisphere by following the migration patterns of whooping cranes and other species. Their free, online educational web site on animal migration had 2.23 million page views in March. The whooping crane has always been one of their featured species. Jane Duden, who compiles all the whooping crane information for Journey North, visited Aransas and the whooping crane festival in Port Aransas at the end of February. She spent time on the Refuge in addition to attending events and tours. The festival this year was dedicated to Aransas Refuge Biologist Tom Stehn and over 3,000 people attended multiple events.
The Whooping Crane Recovery Team held their annual meeting in February in Zacatecas, Mexico in conjunction with the 10th North American Crane Workshop. At these meetings, the Recovery Team formulated its annual work plan, and numerous scientists presented their research findings at the workshop. Thanks go to Dr. Felipe Chavez-Ramirez who organized these international meetings of crane scientists.
The General Accounting Office did an audit of the effectiveness of recovery actions, including plans and expenditures. The whooping crane was one of the species selected to review due to the high expenditures of recovery estimated at 125 million, higher than any of the 107 species reviewed. Tom Stehn participated in a conference call in October and also submitted additional cost estimates. A final GAO report was released in April, 2006. The report stated that the success of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was difficult to measure since some recovery plans reviewed indicated that some species were not likely to be recovered for up to 50 years. When evaluating the ESA, one needs to consider the prospects for recovery rather than just counting up the number of species that have gone extinct (9) and the species recovered (17) out of the 1,272 species listed in the U.S. The GAO recommended that cost estimates and recovery timetables be compiled in the biennial recovery report to Congress. This report could then be used to measure program success and would also provide policy makers with valuable information for identifying resource needs.
The Contingency Plan for the State-Federal Protection of Whooping Cranes was approved in the spring by the Central Flyway Council. The new plan applies only to endangered whooping cranes located in the Central Flyway. A committee of state and federal personnel had clarified text and updated information in the plan. Special thanks go to Helen Hands of the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks for all her efforts helping Tom Stehn and others get this task completed.
Progress continued to be made finalizing the revised Whooping Crane Recovery Plan. Tom Stehn wrote a section responding to public comments received and made needed changes. Data was updated through March, 2006. An additional peer review was conducted at the Crane Workshop to meet new policy directives and more changes were made to the draft plan. This plan should become final in 2006.
There are a maximum of 58 whooping cranes in the nonmigratory Florida population, with 50 birds being monitored. No whooping cranes produced from the captive centers in 2005 or 2006 will be reintroduced into the Florida flock. Five of the Florida nonmigratory cranes apparently took a "vacation" trip to South Carolina in May of 2005. They quickly moved on and their whereabouts remained unknown. In September, 1 from the group of 5 was confirmed back in Florida, but the other 4 have not re-surfaced. During the last 3 months of 2005, two mortalities were documented (power line collision, aspergillosis). Three migratory whooping cranes spent most of December in close proximity to a non-migratory female whooping crane near Lake Wales. This association later broke up. The Florida team transported all of their pen-building materials to a new stop-over and holding site for the WCEP birds (Halpata Tastanaki Preserve in Marion Co) and helped construct a large 2-acre enclosure for the 19 young birds being led by ultra-light aircraft from Wisconsin this fall. One adult crane was captured and placed in the Halpata pen when it interfered with the nesting attempts of a pair of cranes. Later, a smaller portable pen was built to hold this bird in a more central location to the Florida nonmigratory flock. Florida staff also prepared papers and presented them at the 10th North American Crane Workshop.
In the spring, the 10 pairs that nested in 2006 were similar to the 8 pairs that nested last year. However, production was better with 3 chicks surviving into April, and 3 nests still being incubated. This compared with the 1 chick hatched in 2005 that died at 6 days of age. Florida is currently experiencing a drought, with the driest March on record. Marsh water levels dropped rapidly which is expected to deter any failed whooping crane pairs from re-nesting. Unfortunately, a new cause of mortality was recorded for the flock when one nesting female was either stepped on or kicked by a cow, suffering massive damage to her back.
After a long career with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, biologist Steve Nesbitt is retiring in April. In his distinguished career, Steve has published many scientific papers, is a leading expert on cranes in North America, and has won several awards including the Lawrence Walkinshaw award at the 10th North American Crane Workshop.
WHOOPING CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP (WCEP) It was a very successful fall of 2005 for the migration team headed up by Operation Migration. Twenty whooping crane juveniles headed south from Wisconsin following ultralight aircraft. The ultralight migration took 61 days, with flights made on 22 of those days. One bird died en route, apparently from aggression by pen mates at a stopover where the weather had kept the team grounded for 8 days. The birds were flown to a holding pen at Halpata Tastanaki Preserve to wait until the older whooping cranes had returned to the release pen at Chassahowitzka NWR and then dispersed. Numerous partners had pitched in to build a large temporary holding pen at Halpata for the cranes. This included FL Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Southwest FL Water Management District, USFWS, Jacksonville Zoo, Disney Animal Kingdom and USGS - Patuxent. Billy Brooks of USFWS - Jacksonville coordinated this major effort that turned out to be very successful and an important new strategy for managing the juvenile whooping cranes in Florida. The migration team returned to Florida in January and flew the birds from Halpata to the salt marsh pen site at Chassahowitzka. One bird wouldn't follow the aircraft and was placed in a crate and transported by boat.
In the fall, 4 juveniles were released with older wild whooping cranes at Necedah NWR in Wisconsin using a technique referred to as Direct Autumn Release (DAR). It was expected that the juveniles would follow other cranes to suitable wintering sites in the eastern crane flyway. Although it was hoped the juveniles would associate singly with older whooping cranes, the 4 following release got back together as a cohort. On November 24th, they took off with sandhill cranes and headed south, quickly outdistancing the ground tracking team. One DAR juvenile split off, flying 455 miles the first day and roosting in Indiana. On the second day of the migration, the other 3 DAR birds reached Hiwassee Wildlife Refuge in Meigs County, Tennessee, but at different times indicating they were migrating separately and following sandhills.
Two of the DAR birds wintered at Hiwassee, while the other two continued the migration and wintered in separate parts of Florida. All 4 of these DAR birds migrated back north in spring, 2006. During the winter, 3 migratory male whooping cranes associated with an older nonmigratory Florida female in Polk County, Florida. As expected, this association did not last, with the migratory cranes moving on towards the end of February.
One older whooping crane (9-03) continued to migrate out of the expected migration corridor. This bird has a history of this, having spent her second summer in Michigan, and then wintered in North Carolina, only to summer in 2005 in Vermont and New York after spring migration through southeastern Ontario. This bird was captured in December, 2005 on a catfish farm in Beaufort County, North Carolina and transported on a Windway Capital Corporation jet to Florida. She was released at Hixtown Swamp in Madison County, Florida which 3 other whooping cranes were using. Unfortunately, 9-03 migrated north in the spring with one of the juvenile whooping cranes and led it to Michigan.
The 19 juveniles all migrated from Chassahowitzka, one with an older whooping crane, and the other 18 together on March 28. Fourteen of the ultralight juveniles stayed together and returned to the core release area in Wisconsin after a migration of 11 days. The 5 other ultralight juveniles and the 4 DAR birds all left Florida in late March and headed north. One older whooping crane and 1 juvenile migrated together off-course to Michigan, and 1 other bird went to Ontario. In early April, 1 crane that nested at Necedah last year was by itself in Minnesota.
Post-release survival of the Eastern Migratory Population (EMP) has been 64 out of the 76 released. Seven pairs had formed in 2005, with a potential for up to 12 pairs in 2006. Obtaining funding for the WCEP partnership was difficult in 2005, especially for the non-profit partners. However, much was accomplished during the year. The 2005 Annual Report of the Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership was sent out electronically in early April, 2006. Wisconsin is well along in producing a draft management plan for the whooping cranes in their state. In 2006, a flock genetics plan was prepared by Dr. Ken Jones of Kansas State University. Special emphasis will be placed on the genetic makeup of the EMP. The Partnership and Recovery Team decided not to breed 2 females at Patuxent that have already produced many offspring for WCEP which could lead to pairings between full siblings if additional offspring were released. They also planned to release half of the offspring from pairs that previously would have had all their offspring retained in the captive flock. Overall project goals remain the same; to establish a self-sustaining population of a minimum of 100 migratory whooping cranes in eastern North America with 25 breeding pairs. With projected losses of 10% a year, it will take a total of 10 years of releases of at least 20 birds each year to reach this population goal. The project is currently in its 6th year.
The amount of effort and care that goes into captive breeding of whooping crane is phenomenal. This program is extremely important for saving the species if something happens to the wild flocks, and also provides young for reintroduction programs.
Whereas the Species Survival Center had a major battle last August with Hurricane Katrina, the Patuxent Wildlife Research Center was the next captive breeding facility struck by Mother Nature. A 20-inch snow storm on February 11th pulled down flight netting and bent chain link fencing despite staff efforts throughout the night to knock snow off of the overhead nets. Some of the cranes escaped but eventually all were re-captured. Others were treated for minor injuries. One hundred out of 105 pens were damaged. All flight netting had to be replaced and about 6,000 feet of chain link repaired and/or replaced. All this happened just prior to the breeding season and there were major concerns that breeding in 2006 would be disrupted. With emergency funding obtained (over $120 K just for materials) and additional labor coming from other facilities (more than 100 volunteers helped out over several weeks), cranes were moved to temporary pens as pens were repaired one series at a time. It took a tremendous effort but deadlines were met: the birds were all back in their original pens just before the laying season. Egg laying was delayed at Patuxent, with the first egg laid April 10th. One positive result from the storm is that netting has been installed so that it can be lowered in a storm to reduce the damage caused by heavy snow accumulating on the nets.
At the International Crane Foundation (ICF), additional work was planned on their new chick-rearing facility that will enable it to handle up to 20 chicks in 2006. ICF was running out of pen space for the older cranes, and shipped 3 whooping cranes to the San Antonio Zoo on February 6th, including one female needed for pairing. On April 10th they shipped 4 cranes to Patuxent where future mates reside. ICF worked to switch mates between a pair that had not laid in 5 years with a 10-year-old pair that never laid. It is hoped that the switches will stimulate egg-laying. One pair is formed and the other is being socialized. In addition, another male was removed from a female that has never laid in 20 years. He is being socialized with a young female who is also a better genetic match.
The Species Survival Center in New Orleans, Louisiana did exactly that in 2005 - they survived an unprecedented natural disaster that tore apart the city. Like Patuxent, they had cranes to re-capture after Hurricane Katrina and facilities to repair. A tremendous amount was accomplished. In the spring of 2006, they were able to start building a new whooping crane breeding facility that will initially hold 5 pairs in larger ponded pens. Congratulations and kudos to all the crane people at SSC and Patuxent for accomplishing so much in very difficult circumstances.
Calgary currently has 8 breeding pairs of whooping cranes, 1 unpaired male, 2 birds on public display, plus three 2005 hatch birds. Fall health checks showed all birds appear to be in good health. One more enclosure was expanded, and one pair is currently in their larger breeding enclosure.
After several
years serving as chair of the Captive Site Selection Committee, Mr. Dwight
Knapik of the Calgary Zoo decided to rotate the job to someone else. Tom
Stehn with help from Brian Johns will take over the duties. Thanks go
to Dwight for his years of service. WHOOPING CRANE NUMBERS - April 1, 2006
Last updated:
May 5, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||