Crane Recovery Activities
September, 2001 - February, 2002
By Tom Stehn
USFWS Whooping Crane Coordinator
- WOOD BUFFALO
Resource Issues - Freshwater Inflows / Cedar Bayou
/ Global Warming
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP
an absence of over 100 years, migratory whooping cranes were reintroduced
into the eastern United States. In the fall, whooping cranes were led
by ultralight aircraft between Wisconsin and Florida and released at Chassahowitzka
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR).
A new five-year
Canada / U.S. Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation of the Whooping
Crane became effective August 25, 2001. This document was reviewed over
the last year and signed by five different agencies.
Crane Captive Management and Recovery Team meetings were held January
11-14, 2002 in Ottawa, Canada. Veterinarian Dr. Sandie Black of the Calgary
Zoo sat in for former team member Greg Tarry who retired from the Calgary
Zoo. Former team member Dale Hjertaas also sat in with the team representing
the Whooping Crane Conservation Association. About 45 people attended
Team recommended providing approximately 18 chicks in 2002 to both the
Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership and the Florida non-migratory re-introduction.
This will require approximately 44 fertile eggs be produced by the captive
/ WOOD BUFFALO POPULATION
national recovery plan has been approved for the wood bison, designated
as nationally threatened in Canada. The plan's goal is to have a minimum
of 4 viable, healthy, free-ranging wood bison populations in their original
range and other herds where the potential exists. The plan would very
much like to have a disease-free herd in WBNP, but does not provide a
specific way to do this. "The existence of diseased bison in and
around WBNP is the greatest single factor affecting the availability of
original range and the potential for further recovery of wood bison in
northern Alberta, the Northwest Territories, and British Columbia".
Biologists are continuing to work towards the resolution of the northern
diseased bison issue. Currently, 3,536 wood bison exist in Canada that
are free of brucellosis and tuberculosis, including 708 in captivity.
in the crane nesting area has been 20-30 % below average this winter.
This does not bode well for a good nesting season, but spring precipitation
could change this picture.
Jobman of the USFWS Ecological Services office in Grand Island, Nebraska
and Brian Johns, Canadian Wildlife Service in Saskatoon recorded migration
sightings during the fall migration, the 53nd migration monitored since
the tracking project began in the fall of 1975. This is a cooperative
effort by private organizations, state and federal conservation agencies.
The following is from the fall, 2001 cooperative whooping crane tracking
project report written by Wally Jobman.
fall migration was the 53rd migration monitored since tracking began in
the fall of 1975. Sightings were reported from Saskatchewan (30), Alberta
(1), North Dakota (9), South Dakota (1), Nebraska (6), Kansas (9), Oklahoma
(9), and Texas (3). The first dates for confirmed whooping crane sightings
were September 8 in Canada and October 13 in the U.S. The last sighting
date was November 27."
during September and October 2001 was unseasonably mild with above-normal
temperatures. The first major storm moved through the Great Plains on
October 23-24, producing blizzard conditions in eastern North Dakota.
The front reached the Texas coast on October 25, aiding the arrival of
the first migrant whooping cranes at Aransas. Following the passage of
this storm, mild weather returned and the next major storm did not occur
until November 25-26. This storm system initiated a major migration of
waterfowl and cranes and brought heavy snow to the northern Great Plains.
Prior to the arrival of the late-November storm, a family group was still
reported in southeastern Saskatchewan on November 19. About 86 percent
(i.e. 152 birds) of the arrivals at Aransas occurred between October 25
and November 21."
2002 was a break-even year for the Aransas / Wood Buffalo flock. Based
on weekly aerial census flights, the peak whooping crane population in
the 2001-2002 winter equaled 161 adults + 15 chicks = 176 total. This
was four less than the peak of the previous winter (180). Two single-adult
families made it to Aransas, indicating the loss of one adult after nesting.
Canadian Whooping Crane Coordinator Brian Johns re-evaluated his August
sighting data and concluded 15 chicks had fledged from a record 53 nests.
Chick survival in the fall migration was high. However, mortality of adults
between spring and fall, 2001 was estimated at 13 cranes. One adult and
one chick died at Aransas in the 2001-2002 winter. Thus, the population
approaching spring, 2002 is estimated at 174, exactly the same as in the
spring of 2001 after six cranes had died during the 2000-01 winter from
the peak population of 180.
included the second annual banquet and festival at Aransas NWR October
12-13, and the 7th annual Festival of Whooping Cranes and Other Birds
held February 21-24 at Port Aransas, Texas.
15, "closed" signs were posted at six entrances into the interior
marshes at Aransas NWR. This limits access by fisherman, kayakers, and
photographers during the winter period in the area of highest whooping
crane hunting zone along the Texas coast was expanded in 2001-2002. The
entire coast is now open except for a zone around the wintering whooping
cranes (Corpus Christi to Port O'Connor). There no longer is a closure
all along the coast from Highway 35 eastwards. This issue was carefully
coordinated with USFWS and the Flyway Council. This change expands hunting
opportunity for sandhills with only minimal impact on the occasional whooping
cranes that winter away from Aransas. These "stray" whoopers
are covered by the Federal-State Contingency Plan for the Protection of
Whooping Cranes. Data showed that these wandering whoopers were just as
likely to have been outside the former closed zone as inside. The sandhill
season this year in south Texas was December 29 - January 20. Comments
were also provided to TPWD about a proposal to open the sandhill season
in Zone C earlier sometime between December 17-23.
of the Cliburn Ranch that includes a portion of whooping crane critical
habitat at Welder Flats was sold to private individuals in the fall. This
sale was necessitated by inheritance taxes owed that can have the effect
of breaking up large land holdings in South Texas.
A new TPWD
order took effect in February providing a 9-day period when all blue crab
traps had to be removed from public waters. A state-wide pickup was organized
by TPWD to rid the bays of abandoned traps that continue catching fish
and crabs for many months. These traps are also a hazard to navigation
to sports fishermen. On February 23, over 6,800 traps were picked up along
the Texas Coast. Near whooping crane areas, 2,131 traps were picked up
from San Antonio bay by 95 volunteers in 38 boats. In Aransas and Corpus
Christi bays, 1,360 traps were picked up by 122 volunteers in 52 boats.
Specifically in the crane area, over 700 abandoned traps were removed.
Although this was a tremendous effort by all involved, the problem has
been greatly alleviated but is not completely gone. On an aerial survey
conducted after the pickup, 327 abandoned traps were still noted in whooping
ISSUES - FRESHWATER INFLOWS / GLOBAL WARMING
present, the issue of greatest concern for the cranes while at Aransas
is the flow of the freshwater inflows into whooping crane critical habitat.
Data shows that the health and survival of the endangered whooping crane
flock is directly related with freshwater inflows and blue crab populations.
Inflows are needed to produce blue crabs that are the primary food for
whooping cranes. Inflows also maintain salinity levels below 23 parts
per thousand needed for drinking water by the cranes. The Texas Water
Development Board (TWDB) projects an 8 % reduction in blue crab population
in 40 years due to reduced inflows as the human population grows and takes
more water from the Guadalupe River that flows into critical habitat.
Inflows are already insufficient and reduced over historic levels. Taking
water from the lower reaches of the Guadalupe River and pumping them back
to San Antonio as is proposed in the new state water plan has the potential
to adversely impact the Guadalupe-San Antonio Bay Estuary and is a definite
threat to the continued survival of the wintering population of the endangered
whooping crane and its critical habitat. Whooping Crane Coordinator Tom
Stehn worked to spread the word about this issue to USFWS-Ecological Services
personnel and other conservation organizations and wrote a white paper
on the relationship of inflows / blue crabs / and whooping cranes. Carlos
Mendoza, Supervisor of Ecological Services in Clear Lake, Texas submitted
a letter in November to the TWDB about the draft state water plan expressing
concern about the impacts of the plan on inflows needed for endangered
species and other wildlife. Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPWD) was asked
to model inflows of the Guadalupe River using existing data on bay salinities and crab catch data so that the Service can have specific information
needed to comment on water development proposals. Support was also provided
to the San Marcos River Foundation that has applied for a 1.3 million
acre-feet water right that would remain in the river for wildlife and
to maintain bay productivity.
Chavez spent the week of February 11 at Aransas to plan future research
projects on the issue of inflows / blue crabs / and whooping cranes. On
loan for a part of the winter from the Platte River Habitat Trust, and
hopefully supported by a grant from a private endowment, Dr. Chavez will
continue work along the lines of his PhD thesis that studied the foraging
of whooping cranes at Aransas and documented the importance of blue crabs
to the health of whooping cranes. Felipe will also work on sandhill crane
issues in West Texas.
the opening between the barrier islands of Matagorda and San Jose closed
shut with sand during summer and remained closed. This pass is very important
for organisms including shrimp and crabs that move between the bays and
Gulf to complete their life cycle. To maximize blue crab numbers in whooping
crane critical habitat, Cedar Bayou must be open so that spawning females
can more easily travel out into the Gulf to complete their life cycle.
Crab eggs hatch in the Gulf and go through many larval stages as they
move back into the bays. Cedar Bayou has a long history of becoming closed
periodically starting in 1915. It was most recently dredged in 1985 and
1994. Guadalupe River inflows are important to keeping Cedar Bayou open.
The bayou silts up during periods of drought. Human consumption of river
water that has reduced historic flows has worsened the problem. A private
organization called Friends of Cedar Bayou is trying to provide support
to get the bayou dredged. A meeting was held Feb. 28th to organize the
group and continue fund-raising efforts. This dredging is a priority of
TPWD, but funding is currently not available. A total of $800,000 is needed.
If Friends of Cedar Bayou can raise 200 K, Wallop-Breaux funds from boat
excise taxes can be used to provide 75 % of project costs. This funding
mechanism has been used the last two times the bayou has been dredged.
Texas Senator Armbrister at the February 28th meeting spoke about creative
ways of providing funding which could require additional legislation.
issue of concern is global warming. A rise of 3 degrees average temperature
since 1948 has been documented in Wood Buffalo National Park, but no increase
in precipiation was found (Brian Johns, unpublished data). With similar
precipitation and warmer temperatures, there will be more transpiration
and therefore less surface water. This is not a good situation, especially
in drier than normal years for the nesting cranes that do better when
water levels are high.
In a recent
study entitled "Confronting Climate change in the Gulf Coast Region:
Prospects for Sustaining our Ecological Heritage" by Ecological Society
of America and the Union of Concerned Scientists, many of the predictions
are not good for the whooping crane population. There is a strong consensus
among leading climate scientists that the burning of fossil fuels and
other human activities are changing the Earth's climate. For the Gulf
Coast region, climate models predict warmer temperatures and an increase
in the rate of sea-level rise over the next 100 years. Global climate
change will interact with, magnify and exacerbate already existing stresses
on Gulf Coast ecosystems caused by extensive development and rapid population
growth. These stresses include dam building, river diversions, urban and
shoreline development, and other human activities.
- Conflicts over fresh water for States bordering the Gulf of Mexico.
- Climate change will magnify the harmful side effects of human activity
on the region's environment.
- Summer high temperature rise of 3 - 7 degrees and winter low temperatures
to warm by as much as 5 - 10 degrees during the 21st century.
- With warmer temperatures, many invasive tropical species are likely
to extend their ranges northward.
- Reduced rainfall in coastal areas.
- Warming will lead to more extreme rainfall events and longer dry periods,
accelerating sea level rise, coastal flooding, and northward extension
of range of many plants and animals.
- Problems for freshwater supplies for agriculture, industry, and urban
areas are likely to get worse.
- Undermine efforts to restore wetlands and beaches.
- Accelerated sea level rise brought about by melting of polar ice caps
and local land subsidence could lead to higher ocean levels by the end
of the 21st century. In Texas, a mid-range sea-level rise would result
in ocean levels 17 inches higher by 2100. Sea- level rise will have a
disproportionate effect along the Gulf Coast because of its flat topography,
regional land subsidence, extensive shoreline developments, and vulnerability
to major storms. Sea level rise will cause increased coastal erosion,
flooding during storms, and undermine efforts to restore coastal wetlands.
- Salt-water intrusion in coastal ground water sources, a problem already
occurring during droughts, is likely to increase as sea level rises. Rationing
of groundwater withdrawal may become more common.
- Higher water temperatures and increased salinity in estuarine waters
could increase viral and bacterial contamination of shellfish along the
Gulf Coast, negatively impacting the recreational and commercial fishing
- The solution is reducing omissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gas emissions by reducing dependence on fossil fuels would reduce global-warming
gas emissions. Need to develop clean energy sources.
CRANE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP (WCEP)
(web site: www.bringbackthecranes.org)
an absence of over 100 years, migratory whooping cranes were reintroduced
into the eastern flway. In the fall, whooping cranes were led by ultralight
aircraft between Wisconsin and Florida and released at Chassahowitzka
Field work started with the production of 11 chicks in captivity at the
USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. One was lost to a bacterial infection.
Ten were shipped on July 10th to Necedah NWR in central Wisconsin on a
Windway Capital aircraft. One died from capture myopathy during handling
after fledging. One bird was removed from the ultralight program due to
a wing abnormality and shipped to the Audubon Zoo in New Orleans, leaving
eight at Necedah in the fall.
at Necedah was the high level of coliform bacteria found in the pens with
standing water. Although associated health problems were not detected,
the cranes were constantly probing in the water and drinking. Flow-through
water systems may need to be improved to improve water quality. This issue
could have huge implications for cranes in captivity. Although it is important
for reintroduced cranes to have prior experience roosting in water, the
cranes must remain healthy. Similarly, ponds used in captive pens to stimulate
breeding must not add to disease risks.
went in to planning, publicity, and fund raising for WCEP. On September
26th, a donor/media event was held at Necedah NWR. A similar public event
September 29th was attended by 585 people. Both days, the weather cooperated
and people got to see cranes in flight behind the ultralight. On September
27-28, WCEP meetings were held at the International Crane Foundation (ICF)
in Baraboo, Wisconsin. Much planning took place, mostly on specific needs
for the fall migration.
crane reported at the Sandhill WMA in central Wisconsin on November 7th
could not be confirmed. This was a most intriguing sighting, but we could
not totally rule out the presence of a leucistic sandhill.
cranes left Necedah NWR on October 17th behind the ultralight. The team
proceeded south through Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Georgia
and Florida. During the migration, a severe storm with winds in excess
of 50 mph blew down the portable pen during the night of October 24th.
The birds escaped, and one was killed hitting a power line. The remaining
7 cranes were recovered that same night One crane did not follow the plane
well and was trucked daily in a crate, rejoining its cohort every night.
The migration team faced a rash of bad weather and headwinds, necessitating
22 days on the ground with no flight possible. Warm weather in Florida
really slowed things down with days when only 20 miles were covered. The
migration included 26 stops, covered 1,227 miles, and took 50 days. The
longest flight day covered 95 miles, and the longest flight lasted 2.15
hours. The shortest migration leg only lasted 38 minutes. Total flight
time of the birds between Wisconsin and Florida was 35.8 hours.
One of the
highlights for the migration team was a visit by former President Jimmy
Carter and Mrs. Carter on November 17. The migration effort received tremendous
media attention, including coverage on CNN on November 23rd. The Operation
Migration website received 106,600 unique hits to check on the progress
of the migration. The Outreach Team accommodated over 120 individual media
representatives, developed a CD-ROM migration press kit with photos and
sound clips, and distributed landowner appreciation materials. A film
crew from British Broadcasting Corporation filmed portions of the WCEP
project for a crane documentary scheduled to be aired in February, 2003.
Jeff Huxmann of Sunshine Productions was contracted to make a video for
WCEP to meet public relations and fund raising needs.
and field team arrived in Crystal River, Florida on December 3rd to a
very successful arrival ceremony and media event. Two days later, the
cranes were flown to their winter pen in the salt marsh at Chassahowitzka
NWR. Health checks were done December 7th, and satellite transmitters
were placed on three of the birds. A rigid costume rearing protocol was
strictly followed throughout the training, migration, and soft release
with no notable violations so that the cranes would show wild behavior.
It is interesting to note that the arrival of the cranes at Chassahowitzka
NWR occurred exactly five years and one week after Doctors John Cannon
and Felipe Chavez first toured the refuge by airboat in their search for
whooping crane reintroduction sites in the southern U.S.
amount of work was done at Chassahowitzka NWR in preparation for the arrival
of the cranes. The entire staffs at Chassahowitzka and Necedah NWRs are
to be congratulated for all their magnificient support and hard work.
Pen and observation blind construction started the 2nd week in October.
Video equipment in the blind was installed by ICF personnel. The first
week in October, Chassahowitzka burned 2,372 acres of needlerush saltmarsh
to enhance feeding opportunities for the whoopers. The re-growth of the
burn was such that it was once again unsuitably tall for cranes to use
by the end of February.
Team learned that Chassahowitzka is not ideal for whooping cranes. Problems
included large tidal fluctuations that made roosting impossible for the
cranes in the release pen. Some nights the water was too deep, and on
others no water at all was present. Changes including a larger pen and
modifications to the substrate to make roosting habitat more suitable
will need to be made before next winter. Salinities increased later in
the winter and marsh waters became too salty for the whoopers to drink.
Fresh water and pelleted food were provided in the pen throughout the
winter. Early on, crabs were trapped and fed to the whooping cranes. They
did better eating small crabs, and foraging on wild crabs was occasionally
observed throughout the winter. The cranes in general showed little movement
and remained attached to the pen and costumed handler throughout the winter,
similar to behavior of the ultralight sandhills last year.
were taken by bobcats soon after their arrival in Florida. The first bird
killed December 17th outside the pen on burned needlerush marsh was the
crane that had been trucked daily throughout the migration. The second
loss occurred January 7th when the group of cranes apparently roosted
in a narrow bayou too close to a vegetated bank. Two bobcats were trapped
and removed from the area, with no other sign of bobcats detected until
March. Next year, bobcat trapping will need to be initiated just prior
to the arrival of the cranes. After these losses, great care was taken
to try to ensure the cranes roosted nightly in the release pen.
blow for all involved on the WCEP team was the serious stroke that volunteer
pilot Deke Clark suffered in January. Deke remains hospitalized and immobile,
but is undergoing rehabilitation. Our prayers are with Deke, and his kind
and generous spirit and twinkle in his eye remain with the project. A
plaque was presented to Deke in March for all his contributions to the
and Budget Team chaired by Peter Murray of ICF met all obligations with
a direct costs budget of $806,000 of which $507,400 came from private
organizations. Two grants from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
contributed 175 K to the project. In-kind contributions included airplane
transport for the chicks from Windway Capital Corporation, the loan of
three vehicles for four months by DaimlerChrysler Corporation, optical
equipment donated by Svarvoski Corporation, and much donated labor from
Necedah and Chassahowitzka NWRs volunteers and staff, Wisconsin Conservation
Corps, and many others.
information on the results from the sandhill crane experiment conducted
in 2000 comes from the January 2002 Whooping Crane Eastern Partnership
done in 2000 with sandhills to develop reintroduction techniques had great
results. Of the 14 sandhills flown behind the ultralight in Wisconsin,
12 survived to winter in Florida. Eleven were led to St. Martin's Marsh
Aquatic Preserve located next to Chassahowitzka NWR. One male disassociated
from the flock on the first day of the migration, joined wild sandhill
cranes, and wintered in northeastern Florida. On February 25, 2001 ten
of the ultralight sandhills departed on spring migration. The one crane
remaining at St. Martins departed on March 17. This crane was picked up
on June 21 in western North Carolina and removed from the study with signs
of chronic illness and no fear of humans.
the 10 ultralight cranes returned as a group to central Wisconsin, including
time spent on the rearing area at Necedah NWR where they were first sighted
April 27. The one male that had disassociated from the flock the first
day of the ultralight migration also returned to central Wisconsin. Eight
ultralight sandhills started the fall migration from Necedah on November
19 and were tracked that day to Jasper-Pulaski State Fish and Wildlife
Area in northwestern Indiana. The group then disbanded among the 20,000
wild migrating cranes present. Some of the birds were later located at
known sandhill stopover sites in Tennessee, and some wintered in Florida.
Some spent a considerable portion of the winter at Jasper-Pulaski due
to the unusually mild winter conditions, moving on to Hiawassee Refuge
in Tennessee in late January.
were costume-reared and released one by one into flocks of wild sandhills
in central Wisconsin in the fall of 2000. All migrated with wild flocks
of sandhills in mid-November. Six of the eight were confirmed wintering
in Tennessee, Georgia, and Florida. Two cranes with malfunctional transmitters
were not located during the winter. All eight returned to central Wisconsin
in spring, 2001 as integral members of the wild population. The six birds
still being monitored in late fall, 2001 migrated from Wisconsin in mid-November,
with three later found at Jasper-Pulaski and one at Hiawassee State Wildlife
Refuge in eastern Tennessee.
survival, high return rates, and appropriate human avoidance behavior
demonstrated by both the ultralight and one by one releases indicated
that both techniques may be useful in reintroducing whooping cranes to
A draft whooping
crane contingency plan was submitted to the Central Flyway in October
for review. This plan outlines actions to be taken if an eastern whooping
crane strays into the Central Flyway. The Central Flyway is concerned
about this situation since all cranes in the Central Flyway are considered
endangered even if the crane came from the eastern population which is
designated as experimental nonessential under Section 10 (j) of the Endangered
Species Act. Work will continue on this contingency plan until agreed
upon by involved parties.
with over 30 folks attending were held in Crystal River, Florida on February
4-8 to plan for all aspects of the reintroduction in 2002. There is not
much time until field work begins with the first eggs laid in mid-March
number of whooping cranes in Florida reached 103 as more birds were released
in the past six months.
Date # shipped
to FL Place of Origin
September 26 8 Patuxent, HY 2000 birds held back last winter
January 16 5 ICF (birds from Calgary, ICF, and San Antonio)
February 7 7 Patuxent
February 26 7 Patuxent
sent to Florida in September consisted of cranes hatched in 2000 that
were 16 months old. This was only the second time that whooping cranes
were released as subadults. Two of these subadults were taken by an alligator.
The other six are doing well. They were held back from release last winter
due to the continuing drought and the unprecedented disappearance of so
many birds released in the 1999-2000 winter.
are still unaccounted for from the 1999-2000 releases. However, two birds
that had been missing showed back up in the fall, 2001 providing hope
that some of the nine are still alive. Survival of birds released in the
2000-2001 winter was 18 of 21.
the fall greatly helped restore water levels in central Florida. But it
turned dry again over the winter. Some rainfall early in the nesting season
may help a poor nesting year and keep it from being disastrous. At the
end of February 2002, two pairs were sitting on eggs. A total of 13 pairs
are present in Florida.
In late November,
one whooping crane entered thicket habitat and acted strangely. The crane
was captured, but no health problems were uncovered, so the bird was released
back into the wild and after a period of time returned to its normal habits.
On 8 September,
the Florida Wildlife Federation awarded the members of the Florida whooper
team "Wildlife Conservationists of the Year". This is a very
noteworthy accomplishment from a team that has done an excellent job with
all aspects of the whooping crane reintroduction program. Congratulations
is apparently only one whooping crane left in the Rocky Mountains. This
is the cross-fostered bird from 1983 that summers at Red Rocks Lake NWR
in Montana and winters near Belen in the Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico.
The ultralight whooping crane from 1997 spent the summer in Idaho and
apparently started the fall migration sometime around September 6th. It
was not seen in the San Luis Valley in Colorado during the fall migration
and did not winter at the Bosque del Apache NWR in New Mexico. It presumably
died during the fall migration.
October, the International Crane Foundation completed draft language for
a Crane Conservation Act that would provide congressional funding to aid
crane species around the world. The draft is similar to acts for rhinos,
tigers, great apes, and neotropical migratory birds. Tom Stehn helped
with the draft and coordinated with the USFWS International Affairs office
in Washington. This currently is just an idea, but it would be oh so nice
if it ever became a reality.
crane coordinators Brian Johns and Tom Stehn submitted a draft joint whooping
crane recovery plan to their respective agencies in October. A re-write
will be necessary, but hopefully can be completed by the end of 2002.
last year, USFWS funding that helps support the Florida nonmigratory flock
and captive propagation at ICF is being appropriated from the Washington
office rather than from Region 2 Endangered Species funds. In the current
fiscal year, monies will be disbursed from Washington through Regions
3 and 4. Region 2 remains as the lead region for whooping crane recovery
and funds the coordinator's position.
e:mail system was shut down by court order during a trial over Bureau
of Indian Affairs trust fund accounts. My e:mail address Tom_Stehn@fws.gov
can only be used by other USFWS personnel. Non-government people can reach
me at email@example.com which I check in the evenings. This shut-down
is expected to last several more months.
Nile Virus (WNV), an exotic disease introduced in the New York City area
in 1999, has now spread into all states east of the Mississippi River.
It is likely to be found in Texas in 2002. Sampling was done of wild bird
populations and mosquitos at Aransas in the fall looking for the disease.
of this disease on cranes is unknown, but may have caused death or illness
of two sandhill cranes in captivity. USGS at the Patuxent Wildlife Research
Center and the National Wildlife Health Center has started research on
the effects of WNV on sandhills including the effectiveness of a vaccine.
Results obtained by April should help us decide if captive whooping cranes
should be vaccinated. Preliminary results indicate sandhills show resistance
to the disease. The disease seems to effect crows the most.
juveniles produced in Calgary were shipped to ICF in August for socialization
into a cohort destined for the nonmigratory flock in Florida. They were
released into the wild on February 21 with one ICF bird and one San Antonio
bird, along with another cohort of seven Patuxent birds. The captive adult
female "Buffy" was shipped from Calgary to the San Antonio Zoo
on November 29 where she will be paired. This move was part of the genetic
re-shuffling that was recommended by the Captive Management Team in January,
Crane Foundation (ICF)
(web site: www.savingcranes.org)
Crane Foundation was heavily involved on the WCEP team at the Necedah
NWR. Support included veterinary care, rearing, participation on the migration
team, and monitoring of the cranes after release at Chassahowitzka NWR
crane juveniles were shipped to ICF in late summer to form a cohort for
release in the nonmigratory flock in Florida. The cohort of five cranes
came from ICF (1), Calgary (3), and San Antonio (1). One of the Calgary
birds suffered a cervical injury while at ICF, but recovered sufficiently
to be released in Florida. Because of the small cohort size, their shipment
to Florida was delayed until mid-January so that they could be released
at the same time with a cohort from Patuxent.
of the husbandry program at ICF aimed to improve breeding success was
held September 24-26. Participants from other institutions included Dr.
George Gee and Jane Nicolich from Patuxent, and Tom Stehn. Subjects covered
included the role of ponds in pens, bird movements, diet, disturbance,
and photoperiod. Many recommendations were made which mostly have already
been implemented. This was an excellent example of the close cooperation
amongst captive facilities that hold whooping cranes.
PATUXENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH CENTER
(web site: www.pwrc.usgs.gov/cranes.htm)
remains a key player in all aspects of whooping crane recovery. They conduct
multiple research projects which are vital to recovery. In 2001, Patuxent
raised birds for both the ultralight and Florida reintroductions, were
part of the ultralight field team, and participated in both the Recovery
Team, Captive Management and WCEP meetings. They also served on the captive
site selection task force. Jane Nicolich, Patuxent's crane flock manager,
was selected to lead the whooping crane captive management team this year.
shipped 11 whooping cranes to Wisconsin in July, a cohort of eight to
Florida in September, and two cohorts of seven to Florida February 7 and
February 26. One young crane was retained at Patuxent to bolster captive
Howell is the new Dirctor at Patuxent. Dr. Suzette Kimball, Chief Biologist
in the Regional Office has been very supportive of the whooping crane
program and expedited getting the MOU signed. Dr. Jeff Keay of USGS has
been assigned from the Eastern Regional office to strengthen the research
effort. He has been meeting with the crane program team and has been moving
the research program forwards. Jeff visited Tom Stehn at Aransas December
4-5 to coordinate the Patuxent research program with Recovery Team needs.
Team in January discussed recovery research needs. The top research projects
in priority order are:
- Investigate fresh water ecology at Aransas NWR, including inflows of
fresh water, blue crab ecology, and sociological studies.
- Investigate issues concerning the age at first breeding in the captive
- Conduct a PHVA using adaptive management techniques with the Florida
non- migratory whooping crane population.
- Investigate leg and wing abnormalities in captive whooping cranes.
- Investigate further the technique of one-by-one releases or other techniques.
- Investigate avian tuberculosis.
- Investigate nutrition in whooping cranes.
the following research topics should continue to be investigated (not
in priority order):
- Investigate the crepuscular behavior of whooping cranes in Florida and
- Continue to do research on cryopreservation
- Continue to investigate genetic diversity
- Continue to investigate West Nile Virus
has purchased equipment and are in the process of building an
anonymous fragment length polymorphism DNA lab to increase the genetics
effort. They hope to begin processing samples late in 2002.
French supervises crane core operations at Patuxent and converted
four of seven biological technician term positions to permanent biological
technician positions. Other term positions will continue as long as there
are research studies to support them. Until recently, the crane program
one permanent technician position and seven term appointments.
Ellis assumed editorial responsibilities for the Eighth North American
Crane Workshop for the North American Working Group and published the
proceedings in December. Dave did a tremendous job on this. It is very
important that researchers document the projects they have done so that
recovery can keep moving forward.
CENTER for RESEARCH on ENDANGERED SPECIES (ACRES)
currently has five whooping cranes. One pair (McFuzz and Susan) exhibits
a strong pair bond and hopefully will start producing soon. The male "Fred"
remains unpaired after showing aggression on numerous occasions to a potential
mate. One female was transferred December 20 from San Antonio. Three additional
whooping cranes from Patuxent and one from Lowry Park are scheduled for
transfer in 2002 to ACRES. The shipment from Patuxent was delayed because
one bird was sick, and another was needed for use as an imprint model
for the ultralight chicks hatched in the spring of 2002.
Park is an important cooperator for whooping crane recovery. This zoo
in Tampa, Florida can hold injured birds for rehabilitation, and also
is one of the five places in the world where a whooping crane is on public
display. The crane with valuable genetics that Lowry Park has been holding
is scheduled to be shipped in the near future to ACRES for pairing. One
crane from ICF was shipped to Lowry Park on January 16, 2002 to keep on
an historic return of whooping cranes to the Audubon Zoo in New Orleans,
one of the ultralight cranes with a wing problem was pulled from the reintroduction
program in Wisconsin and shipped to New Orleans on November 2. This crane
seemed to make the transition to seeing un-costumed crane handlers quite
easily. A male crane hatched in 2000 in San Antonio was shipped to the
Zoo in early January. This future pair is currently being held in adjacent
pens and seem to be adjusting well to their new surroundings. Tom Stehn
is working with the Zoo on a letter of understanding about whooping cranes.
San Antonio Zoo is an important partner in the captive management of whooping
cranes. It keeps one breeding pair of cranes on display and one pair off
display. San Antonio received shipment of the female crane "Buffy"
from Calgary in November. Plans call for three breeding pairs to be held
in San Antonio when one crane currently at Patuxent gets moved to Texas.
San Antonio raised one whooping crane juvenile that was appropriately
named "Lonestar". In the fall, Lonestar was shipped to ICF where
it was socialized into a cohort of five. Upon release in Florida, Lonestar
split off from its cohort and was taken the first night apparently by
an alligator. The two juveniles raised at San Antonio in 2001 were shipped
in January to ACRES and the New Orleans Zoo. They had been pulled from
the reintroduction program in Florida because of the deepening drought
and fears that birds released in drought conditions would be more vulnerable
CRANE NUMBERS / MARCH 1, 2002
in the Wild
peak size of the AWBP for the 2001-2002 winter was 161+15=176. One
chick and one adult subsequently died on the wintering grounds.
Crane Foundation, WI
Wildlife Conservation Center/Calgary
Antonio Zoo, Texas
Park Zoo, Tampa, Florida
(Wild + Captive) 283 + 114 = 397